RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% | |
2 | BEI Karen | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
3 | KIM Zoe L. | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 28% |
3 | BUSH Emma | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
5 | WANG Nora | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% | |
6 | LAN Alice S. | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 18% | |
7 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% | |
8 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
9 | YAO Yilin | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
10 | LAVERY Chloe K. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
11 | KELLY Jenna | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
12 | CHANG Celine A. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
13 | LEE Natasha | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 11% | |
14 | MUN Brianna K. | - | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% | |
15 | TAN Jocelyn | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
16 | LARA Ortiz Valeria | - | < 1% | - | 3% | 18% | 47% | 32% |
17 | NGUYEN Tallulah | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% |
18 | LIN Ashley | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - |
19 | LEUNG Wan Kiu Hayley | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 11% | |
20 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
21 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 3% |
22 | LI Vivian | 3% | 21% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
23 | KIM Jayna | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
24 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
25 | SHARMA Sanvi | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | |
26 | CHA Eugenie | 4% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
27 | HSIU Elizabeth | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
28 | LEE Olivia | 1% | 9% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
29 | LOUIE Sarah | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
30 | NEISINGH Isabelle | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
31 | XU Katelyn | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | |
32 | HUANG Lanlan | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
33 | KUKVA Taisiya | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
34 | WANG Angelina | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
35 | ENRILE Erica | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
36 | LIANG Jingjing | 57% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
37 | DERAKSHANDEH Donya | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
38 | GULLY Wren | 8% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
39 | PHUKAN Indra | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | |
40 | HAU Olivia | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
41 | POON Desiree | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
42 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 17% | 50% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
43 | BLANCO Ariia | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
44 | MITRANI Gabriela | 30% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
45 | SI Amelia | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.