Chaminade High School - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHI Alexander | - | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 5% |
2 | PIESNER Zachary C. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 7% |
3 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 38% | 56% |
3 | REDDINGTON Aidan | - | - | 5% | 25% | 47% | 22% | |
5 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
6 | LAKE Wyatt J. | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
7 | HUANG Kevin D. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 47% | 23% | |
8 | HUANG Alston | 11% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
9 | NGUYEN Liam | - | 1% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
10 | HAHN Jacob | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | < 1% | - |
11 | MESERVE Max | - | - | 2% | 17% | 50% | 31% | |
12 | BUTLER Owen | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
13 | DALVA Michael | 25% | 43% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
14 | BRENNAN Ty | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
15 | HARRIS Rhonen | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
16 | CHIN Yit-Meng | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
17 | STEIGLITZ Matthew | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
18 | NA Larry | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% | - |
19 | RAMOS Russell K. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
20 | GHOTANIAN Marc | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
21 | ORNELAS Matteo | 8% | 44% | 40% | 8% | - | - | |
22 | KUO Jayden | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
23 | YORK Lucas | - | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% |
24 | GALAVIZ MacArthur | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
25 | MARKS Ryan | 8% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
26 | GRAPHIA Gabriel | 21% | 60% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - |
27 | SMITH Jeremiah | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 8% |
28 | REECE Chapin | 6% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
29 | RIORDAN Micah | 7% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | |
30 | CONWAY Matthew | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | - |
31 | CROUTCH Justin | 26% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
32 | HORWATT Eliyah | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
33 | MYERS Kevin | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% |
34 | SOSTCHEN Jacob | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
35 | WALTHERS Bjorn | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 38% | |
36 | GONZALEZ Pablo | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 45% | 19% |
37 | WACZIARG Simon | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
38 | DESPRES Kaz | - | 6% | 29% | 44% | 19% | 2% | |
39 | LEWIS Jake | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
40 | CROUTCH Ethan | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 3% |
41 | NORDEN Max | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 2% | |
42 | DAY Avo | 5% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% | - | |
43 | THORNTON Maximilian | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
44 | PERDIGAO Cooper | 38% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
45 | JUAREZ Semaje | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
46 | SAUTER Luke | 62% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.