Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RIGHTLER Samuel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
| 2 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 22% |
| 3 | YUN Jaesun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 39% |
| 3 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 5 | HOUTZ Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% |
| 6 | GHENEA George Philipe | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 7 | KOGAN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 13% |
| 8 | JAWOROWSKI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 9 | KUSHKOV Veniamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% | |
| 10 | KIM Shaun M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% |
| 11 | BERRIO Carter E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 21% |
| 12 | CHIN Matthew W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 13 | ZHOU Aeres Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 14% | |
| 14 | OH Triton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 8% |
| 15 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
| 16 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 17 | SHERWOOD Hayden F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 18 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 19 | AKS Ari | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | PATIL Aaryan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 21% |
| 21 | WANG Nicolas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | LEUNG Nathan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 23 | BOUKHTIN Maxim | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | LU Caleb Q. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 25 | RADY-PENTEK Charles A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | MCCLUNG Gavin | 100% | 96% | 67% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 27 | DENISON Joseph | 100% | 93% | 58% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | CANNON Logan T. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | LUHMAN Gabriel | 100% | 92% | 59% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | ORIATTI-BRUNS Vincent M. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | FIRSTMAN William B. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
| 32 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 33 | SU Landon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 34 | LAGROU Emerson R. | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 35 | WANG William | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | YI Carey | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% | 2% | |
| 37 | CHAN Aidan | 100% | 99% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 38 | HAN Edward | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 39 | GERSTMANN Max T. | 100% | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 40 | CARTAGENA Caden A. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 41 | SHANKWILER Christopher | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 42 | ZHANG William | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 43 | KOCHENSPARGER III Robert L. | 100% | 87% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | HU Christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
| 44 | HU-VAN REETH Alexander | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | KUSHKOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 47 | HUNG Samuel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 7% | 1% |
| 48 | NORBORG Domingo | 100% | 80% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | CHEN Zejia | 100% | 78% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 50 | HOFFMAN Pasquale | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | YU Thomas | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | HUSTON Theodore | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
| 53 | PARADIS Emmit | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | SUSTAR Mir | 100% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | HENDERSON Jack | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.