The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TSAI Xiao-Qing E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% |
| 2 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 2% |
| 3 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 7% |
| 3 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% | |
| 5 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 6 | TAKAGI Hikaru G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% | |
| 7 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 8 | LEE Ji Ahn | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 9 | SHIH Diane | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 35% | 5% |
| 10 | YIN Helen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
| 11 | PRIETO Sofia M. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 3% | |
| 12 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 13 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 14 | LI Shuang | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 15 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 16 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 3% | |
| 18 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 19 | CHENG Lydia A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% | |
| 20 | KONG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 21 | MU Allison | 100% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 22 | MING Yue | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | |
| 24 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 25 | PENG Serena | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 6% | |
| 27 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 28 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 1% |
| 29 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 29 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | YEH Marissa E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 32 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | VELAZQUEZ Rosa T. | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 34 | BOLES Amanda X. | 100% | 89% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 36 | YANG Alice | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 37 | WANG Celine S. | 100% | 85% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | WELBORN Calissa | 100% | 88% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | NICKOLOV Nora | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.