Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | |
2 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
3 | BATRA Chaahat | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% |
3 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 8% | |
5 | UPTON Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
6 | KOSTELNY Alexis | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% | |
7 | ROY Layla | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
8 | HAYES Alyssa R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 34% | 6% | |
9 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
10 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | |
11 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 20% | |
12 | SASSE Savitri A. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
13 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 7% | |
14 | KIM April | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 14% | 1% | |
15 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 12% | |
16 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
17 | KOKES Gwendolen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% | |
18 | BASSIK Eva | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
19 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 6% | - |
20 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
21 | GOOR Viviene E. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
22 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% | |
23 | HWANG Jungmin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
24 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
25 | TAN Eden E. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 29% | 5% | - | |
26 | BAWA Sahana | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | |
27 | LEE Fiona E. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
28 | KNOPF Jenna G. | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | |
29 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
30 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
30 | HOANG Mai | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
32 | TUCKER ALARCON Frida | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
33 | SHINKAREV Olga | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 5% | |
34 | PFLAUM Philippa J. | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
35 | GOLLNICK Mira | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
36 | RAZA Nadia A. | 100% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
37 | SHELTON Devyn | 100% | 86% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
38 | SKOURLETOS Maria | 100% | 91% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
39 | ANDERSON Elizabeth | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
40 | ZHOU Sophia | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
41 | JACOBSON Leah | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
42 | BIODROWICZ Julia | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
43 | PARK Leah | 100% | 29% | 2% | - | - | - | |
44 | CUI Katelyn | 100% | 93% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.