Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | 5% | 95% |
2 | GLOVER James | 6% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 2% |
3 | YI Stephen K. | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
3 | CHIN Julian S. | - | - | 5% | 38% | 57% |
5 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | - | - | 8% | 42% | 50% |
6 | SONG Aiden S. | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% |
7 | LEE Connor C. | - | 3% | 29% | 68% | |
8 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | 7% | 30% | 43% | 21% | - |
9 | KIM Derek A. | - | 4% | 25% | 48% | 23% |
10 | PAI Lakshan K. | 2% | 14% | 38% | 37% | 9% |
11 | LOVIN Vlad | - | 10% | 61% | 26% | 3% |
12 | LYUTIKOV Yegor | - | 2% | 24% | 51% | 22% |
13 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 12% | 37% | 38% | 13% | - |
14 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 28% | 53% | 18% | 1% | |
15 | GOOR Julian | - | - | 17% | 57% | 25% |
16 | DEGROOT Blake | 11% | 37% | 39% | 13% | - |
17 | CULLIVAN Justice | - | 1% | 13% | 45% | 40% |
18 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 1% | 12% | 41% | 38% | 8% |
19 | NIE Justin | 6% | 41% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
19 | SHEN Troy R. | 2% | 25% | 48% | 22% | 3% |
21 | KHAN Adnan | 47% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - |
22 | ORVANANOS Jorge | 1% | 12% | 41% | 38% | 8% |
23 | CHIN Ryan | 48% | 44% | 8% | - | |
24 | JI Aidan Y. | 1% | 10% | 51% | 33% | 5% |
25 | PALWAI Suhas | 54% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - |
26 | WEATHERINGTON Jude A. | 38% | 55% | 7% | - | - |
27 | KUSHNIR Aden N. | 47% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - |
28 | WOO Christian | 3% | 26% | 57% | 14% | |
29 | CAZER Mosby | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - |
30 | SHEN Luke R. | 17% | 51% | 27% | 5% | - |
31 | LIU Jacob B. | 22% | 43% | 28% | 6% | - |
31 | BAO Aaron | 6% | 32% | 42% | 18% | 2% |
33 | IVANENKO Alex | 53% | 44% | 3% | - | - |
34 | AMES Tucker | 37% | 56% | 7% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.