ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GHEDINI Luca | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
| 2 | XU Andy P. | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 3 | CHENG Ethan | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
| 3 | RUIZ ALMEIDA Muhammad | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 5 | GUTH Joseph | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 6 | GERRISH William | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% |
| 7 | TAN Aidan | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 8 | ZHAO Adam | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | SIMONOV Timofey | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 47% | 9% |
| 10 | MARTIN Darius | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 11 | GULCHIN Mark | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
| 12 | CHENG Logan | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 13 | SION Andrew | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | CHEN Ethan | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 15 | XIE Jicheng | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 16 | HONG Logan | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | HAN Alexander | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 18 | ZHANG Lucas | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 19 | HOU Gaven | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 20 | LIU Eric | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | TANG Terry | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 3% |
| 22 | JIMENEZ Naveen | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 23 | BOBROW Silas | - | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 6% |
| 24 | LAO Kevin | 3% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 25 | HARRA Alexander | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 26 | XU Nathan | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 27 | TOOMRE Kai | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 28 | MCGILLION-MOORE Charles | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | WONG Jacob W. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | SICAT Justin | 7% | 33% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | CHEN Hanson | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 32 | BAKSHI Aman | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 33 | WANG Ancen | 9% | 40% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | MOREA Anderson | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 35 | SHANNON Jack | 11% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | HUANG Jinyao | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | HOLMES Alexiy | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 38 | DAO-CRESPO Joaquin | 53% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | UNGERER Henry | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | SUNDSTROM Wren | 25% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | QIAN Zekai | 25% | 40% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | CHEN Darren | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.