ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GHEDINI Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
2 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
3 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
3 | RUIZ ALMEIDA Muhammad | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
5 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
6 | GERRISH William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 42% | 9% |
7 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
8 | ZHAO Adam | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
9 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 9% |
10 | MARTIN Darius | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% |
11 | GULCHIN Mark | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 8% |
12 | CHENG Logan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
13 | SION Andrew | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
14 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
15 | XIE Jicheng | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
16 | HONG Logan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | 11% | 1% |
17 | HAN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
18 | ZHANG Lucas | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
19 | HOU Gaven | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
20 | LIU Eric | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
21 | TANG Terry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 22% | 3% |
22 | JIMENEZ Naveen | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
23 | BOBROW Silas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 6% |
24 | LAO Kevin | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
25 | HARRA Alexander | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
26 | XU Nathan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
27 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
28 | MCGILLION-MOORE Charles | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
29 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
30 | SICAT Justin | 100% | 93% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
31 | CHEN Hanson | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
32 | BAKSHI Aman | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
33 | WANG Ancen | 100% | 91% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
34 | MOREA Anderson | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
35 | SHANNON Jack | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
36 | HUANG Jinyao | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
37 | HOLMES Alexiy | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 5% | 1% |
38 | DAO-CRESPO Joaquin | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
39 | UNGERER Henry | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
40 | SUNDSTROM Wren | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
41 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
42 | CHEN Darren | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.