ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEONG Heonjae | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
| 2 | CHEONG Heonjun | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 3 | HUANG Ethan F. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 3 | KOGAN Benjamin | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 23% |
| 5 | FENG Leo | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 5 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | < 1% |
| 7 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 8 | HONG Vincent Q. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
| 9 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% |
| 9 | LEE Justin | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 8% |
| 11 | DENG Andrew | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% | |
| 12 | CHEN Leo | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 39% | 12% |
| 13 | LIN John A. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
| 14 | HUANG Connor | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 15 | PENG Bryan | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 16 | WEBER Mattias A. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 17 | HO Kaden M. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
| 18 | MAKLIN Edward P. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 19 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
| 19 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 21 | MORALES Jonathan | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 22 | WANG Charles | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 23 | BROU Inkosi | 1% | 11% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 23 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | MICLAUS Justin | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 26 | KUSHKOV Veniamin | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
| 27 | HOPPA Luke H. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 28 | ALTIRS Alexander | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 29 | PRIMUS Nazir | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 30 | HAN Daniel Y. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
| 31 | SHOMAN Noah | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 32 | WU Wilmund | - | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 33 | ZHENG Edward L. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 34 | WILSON Jude | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 35 | FIGUEREDO Adrian | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 36 | PANDEY Neil | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 37 | LIU Lawrence | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 38 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | CHEN Evan P. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
| 40 | PAN Alex | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 41 | SHAHZAD Azlan A. | 1% | 15% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 42 | FLOT Tai A. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 42 | WAXLER Seth B. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
| 42 | TENG MATTHEW | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 45 | RODE Leon J. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 46 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | 1% | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 47 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 48 | GINSBERG jordan | 5% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 49 | KESSLER Josh | 8% | 35% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | SHI Jeremy | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | PERRON Robert | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | DEKA Tanush | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 53 | SAVOY Luca | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 54 | OH Triton | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 55 | HU Andrew | 1% | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 56 | STERN Tobias | 7% | 34% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | |
| 58 | MOULTON Ian | 25% | 41% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | HUANG Tom | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 60 | NG Jeremiah | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 61 | FALCON-KORB Mathis | 19% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | ELIN Adam E. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 63 | LI Yao (Liam) | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 64 | OU Brian | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 65 | FREDRICK Jameer | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | MCCARTHY Devan | 4% | 36% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 67 | MEAD Matthew | 12% | 56% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 68 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 33% | 44% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 69 | WEIL Asher D. | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 70 | KAPOOR Tanmay | 34% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | TROPE Aidan | 47% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 72 | RAGAN STEINSSON Sigurdur | 53% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 72 | YEUNG Jerry | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 74 | GILPIN Samuel | 18% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | TSAO Oliver | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | JEHU Cian | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.