The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

2022 Winter Thrust RYC/RJCC

Y-14 Men's Saber

Sunday, February 6, 2022 at 4:00 PM

ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 GONG Jerry - 5% 21% 38% 29% 7%
2 HUANG Alex F. - - 2% 14% 42% 42%
3 BONETTI Brayden - - 1% 8% 28% 42% 21%
3 KWALWASSER Eric - - 4% 15% 33% 35% 13%
5 ANTHONY Devyn V. - - - 2% 12% 38% 48%
6 SAGE Sebastian - 1% 6% 25% 43% 25%
7 EYBELMAN Ariel - - 5% 20% 39% 29% 7%
8 WANG daniel - 3% 14% 32% 33% 16% 3%
9 BERA Enzo - - 1% 6% 23% 41% 28%
9 LIU Lawrence - - 1% 8% 30% 42% 19%
11 HE Bowen 1% 8% 24% 35% 25% 7%
12 FRANCOIS Alexander C. 1% 7% 25% 36% 24% 7% 1%
13 FALCON-KORB Mathis 1% 7% 26% 38% 23% 5%
14 SHINCHUK Daniel 1% 7% 24% 38% 25% 6%
15 BRANDT Jaden 2% 13% 30% 33% 18% 4%
16 HUANG Maxwell H. - 4% 17% 35% 33% 11%
17 CLARK Aram - 1% 11% 34% 40% 13%
18 LI Yao (Liam) - 2% 12% 31% 34% 17% 3%
19 NARDINI Nathanael P. - 2% 12% 31% 37% 17%
19 NGUYEN Anthony - 3% 14% 33% 35% 14%
21 KIM Ethan - 1% 10% 29% 40% 20%
22 PEREIRA Beckham - 6% 22% 35% 27% 9% 1%
23 KESSLER Nathan 2% 15% 34% 32% 14% 3% -
24 URSU Marcel T. - 5% 24% 42% 25% 4%
25 ALAVE Kyle 2% 13% 31% 33% 17% 3%
26 SUGIURA Samuel 1% 6% 22% 35% 27% 8%
27 LIN Maxim - 2% 14% 33% 34% 15% 2%
28 BODKIN Jake M. - 6% 22% 35% 27% 9% 1%
29 WAXLER Ryan - 5% 22% 36% 26% 9% 1%
30 LEE Matthew 3% 17% 33% 31% 14% 2%
31 CHUNG Connor 8% 28% 37% 21% 6% 1%
32 LIN Philip T. - 4% 17% 33% 33% 13%
33 SHIPITSIN Alexander - 3% 20% 39% 30% 8%
34 LIU Kevin - 2% 12% 29% 35% 19% 4%
35 SINGER Marcus 5% 28% 40% 21% 5% 1% -
36 PRIEUR Christian F. 5% 22% 36% 27% 9% 1%
37 CLARK Gabriel - 5% 19% 35% 31% 11%
38 OH Aster 7% 37% 38% 15% 3% -
39 MENDOZA Diwa 9% 29% 35% 21% 6% 1%
40 NG Jonathan 4% 19% 33% 29% 13% 2%
41 VAROQUA Nalby 1% 5% 20% 35% 30% 9%
42 ANAND Sahil Z. 1% 7% 24% 35% 25% 8% 1%
43 WITCZAK Mateus 5% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1%
44 LESUEUR Luke J. 3% 16% 34% 32% 13% 2%
45 MARGULIAN Grant 2% 13% 33% 35% 15% 2%
46 WONG Caleb W. 13% 35% 34% 15% 3% -
47 LEE Andrew 8% 27% 36% 22% 7% 1%
48 LIGH Checed 18% 39% 30% 11% 2% -
49 KALOUDIS Sean 5% 23% 36% 26% 8% 1%
50 KATZ Ryan 1% 12% 30% 34% 19% 5% -
51 HERR Gabriele - 1% 7% 22% 36% 27% 7%
52 MEDVINSKY Daniel - 2% 12% 29% 35% 19% 3%
53 MENON Arjun 34% 41% 19% 5% 1% - -
54 LEUNG Ian 1% 7% 25% 37% 24% 6%
55 LAUB William 6% 30% 40% 20% 4% -
56 VILEMAITIS Tadas 10% 33% 36% 17% 4% -
57 AUDOLY Maxim 3% 22% 45% 25% 5% -
58 MONTALVO Matthew 59% 34% 7% 1% - -
59 LIM Brandon 5% 24% 39% 25% 6% 1% -
60 MILLET Etienne 2% 17% 36% 31% 12% 2% -
61 DOCIL Jack 39% 41% 16% 3% - - -
62 CARROLL Charles 6% 24% 35% 25% 9% 1%
63 WELSTEAD Nicholas 16% 36% 32% 14% 3% -
64 BUCK Maximilian 40% 43% 15% 2% - -
65 BLEY Gabriel 29% 44% 22% 5% - - -
66 ONG Dylan 21% 39% 28% 10% 2% -
67 VON JAN Vincent 6% 46% 36% 11% 2% - -
68 GOLD Max 6% 26% 37% 24% 7% 1%
69 WHITE Blake 7% 32% 40% 18% 4% - -
70 LIU Alexander 56% 34% 8% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.