ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GONG Jerry | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
2 | HUANG Alex F. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% | |
3 | BONETTI Brayden | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
3 | KWALWASSER Eric | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 13% |
5 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% |
6 | SAGE Sebastian | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
7 | EYBELMAN Ariel | - | - | 5% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% |
8 | WANG daniel | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
9 | BERA Enzo | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
9 | LIU Lawrence | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% |
11 | HE Bowen | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | |
12 | FRANCOIS Alexander C. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
13 | FALCON-KORB Mathis | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
14 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
15 | BRANDT Jaden | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | |
16 | HUANG Maxwell H. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
17 | CLARK Aram | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 13% | |
18 | LI Yao (Liam) | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
19 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
19 | NGUYEN Anthony | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
21 | KIM Ethan | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
22 | PEREIRA Beckham | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
23 | KESSLER Nathan | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
24 | URSU Marcel T. | - | 5% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 4% | |
25 | ALAVE Kyle | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
26 | SUGIURA Samuel | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | |
27 | LIN Maxim | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
28 | BODKIN Jake M. | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
29 | WAXLER Ryan | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
30 | LEE Matthew | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
31 | CHUNG Connor | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
32 | LIN Philip T. | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 13% | |
33 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | - | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | |
34 | LIU Kevin | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
35 | SINGER Marcus | 5% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
36 | PRIEUR Christian F. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
37 | CLARK Gabriel | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 11% | |
38 | OH Aster | 7% | 37% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - | |
39 | MENDOZA Diwa | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
40 | NG Jonathan | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% | |
41 | VAROQUA Nalby | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% | |
42 | ANAND Sahil Z. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
43 | WITCZAK Mateus | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
44 | LESUEUR Luke J. | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
45 | MARGULIAN Grant | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
46 | WONG Caleb W. | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
47 | LEE Andrew | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
48 | LIGH Checed | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
49 | KALOUDIS Sean | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
50 | KATZ Ryan | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
51 | HERR Gabriele | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
52 | MEDVINSKY Daniel | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
53 | MENON Arjun | 34% | 41% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
54 | LEUNG Ian | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
55 | LAUB William | 6% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | |
56 | VILEMAITIS Tadas | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | |
57 | AUDOLY Maxim | 3% | 22% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | |
58 | MONTALVO Matthew | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
59 | LIM Brandon | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
60 | MILLET Etienne | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
61 | DOCIL Jack | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
62 | CARROLL Charles | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
63 | WELSTEAD Nicholas | 16% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
64 | BUCK Maximilian | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
65 | BLEY Gabriel | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
66 | ONG Dylan | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | |
67 | VON JAN Vincent | 6% | 46% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
68 | GOLD Max | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
69 | WHITE Blake | 7% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
70 | LIU Alexander | 56% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.