ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% | |
2 | HUANG Alex F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | |
3 | BONETTI Brayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
3 | KWALWASSER Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
5 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
6 | SAGE Sebastian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
7 | EYBELMAN Ariel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 7% |
8 | WANG daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
9 | BERA Enzo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
9 | LIU Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% |
11 | HE Bowen | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% | |
12 | FRANCOIS Alexander C. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
13 | FALCON-KORB Mathis | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
14 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 6% | |
15 | BRANDT Jaden | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | |
16 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
17 | CLARK Aram | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 13% | |
18 | LI Yao (Liam) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
19 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 17% | |
19 | NGUYEN Anthony | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 14% | |
21 | KIM Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
22 | PEREIRA Beckham | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
23 | KESSLER Nathan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
24 | URSU Marcel T. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 29% | 4% | |
25 | ALAVE Kyle | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 3% | |
26 | SUGIURA Samuel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% | |
27 | LIN Maxim | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
28 | BODKIN Jake M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
29 | WAXLER Ryan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
30 | LEE Matthew | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
31 | CHUNG Connor | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
32 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 13% | |
33 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 8% | |
34 | LIU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
35 | SINGER Marcus | 100% | 95% | 67% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
36 | PRIEUR Christian F. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
37 | CLARK Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | |
38 | OH Aster | 100% | 93% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | |
39 | MENDOZA Diwa | 100% | 91% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
40 | NG Jonathan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% | |
41 | VAROQUA Nalby | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
42 | ANAND Sahil Z. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
43 | WITCZAK Mateus | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
44 | LESUEUR Luke J. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
45 | MARGULIAN Grant | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
46 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
47 | LEE Andrew | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
48 | LIGH Checed | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | |
49 | KALOUDIS Sean | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
50 | KATZ Ryan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
51 | HERR Gabriele | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
52 | MEDVINSKY Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
53 | MENON Arjun | 100% | 66% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
54 | LEUNG Ian | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
55 | LAUB William | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | |
56 | VILEMAITIS Tadas | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
57 | AUDOLY Maxim | 100% | 97% | 75% | 30% | 5% | - | |
58 | MONTALVO Matthew | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
59 | LIM Brandon | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
60 | MILLET Etienne | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
61 | DOCIL Jack | 100% | 61% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
62 | CARROLL Charles | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
63 | WELSTEAD Nicholas | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | |
64 | BUCK Maximilian | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
65 | BLEY Gabriel | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
66 | ONG Dylan | 100% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | |
67 | VON JAN Vincent | 100% | 94% | 49% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
68 | GOLD Max | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
69 | WHITE Blake | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
70 | LIU Alexander | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.