Meredith Middle School - Des Moines, IA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SUVOROV Yuly | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% | |
2 | TUCKER Brad W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 53% | 12% | |
3 | BUTLER Joseph D. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
3 | BURGESS James E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
5 | BENFORD Kailan A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% | |
6 | BUCKINGHAM Emma N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 12% | |
7 | CHRISTIAN John R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 4% | |
8 | LIMER Avi | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
9 | ROBBINS Christopher (Chris) W. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
10 | KOVANDA Cassidy K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
11 | YOUNG Jessica L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
12 | BISSEN Quinn | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
13 | GUST Jadyn | 100% | 76% | 30% | 5% | < 1% | - | |
14 | MILLIAN Matthew | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
15 | MUSEL Daniel | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 16% | 1% | |
16 | TAKATA Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
17 | BUTTZ John-Henry | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
18 | CELSI Nick L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
19 | HART Jackson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 5% | |
20 | OBERLY Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
21 | MARCUSON Timothy C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |
22 | ARAYE Nasro | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
23 | STEPHENS Rick W. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
24 | STOECKEL Sofia I. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
25 | KNIGHT Ethan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% | |
26 | TENHUNDFELD Jack | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 7% | - | |
27 | RHEA Eric L. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - | |
28 | STONER Shanrael M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% | |
28 | JOHNSON Jay | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% | |
30 | JOHNSTONE Mathew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 57% | 13% | |
31 | SCHLIEP Anna J. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 31% | 5% | - | |
32 | FITZGERALD Thomas R. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - |
33 | MOHAMED Faisa | 100% | 87% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | |
34 | SHOEMAKER Oliver | 100% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
35 | FRANZ Lisa L. | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
36 | EULENSTEIN Chantal | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
37 | KUHN Jeffrey | 100% | 96% | 70% | 29% | 5% | - | |
38 | HONEK Kyle | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
39 | RHEA Heather | 100% | 90% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
40 | JOHNSTONE Natasha | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
41 | HANSON Aimee E. | 100% | 92% | 60% | 19% | 2% | - | |
42 | STANLEY Patrick | 100% | 96% | 71% | 29% | 5% | - | |
43 | JUNK Heather | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.