Meredith Middle School - Des Moines, IA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SUVOROV Yuly | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% | |
| 2 | TUCKER Brad W. | - | - | 8% | 39% | 41% | 12% | |
| 3 | BUTLER Joseph D. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 3 | BURGESS James E. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
| 5 | BENFORD Kailan A. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 6 | BUCKINGHAM Emma N. | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 41% | 12% | |
| 7 | CHRISTIAN John R. | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 4% | |
| 8 | LIMER Avi | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 9 | ROBBINS Christopher (Chris) W. | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 10 | KOVANDA Cassidy K. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 11 | YOUNG Jessica L. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
| 12 | BISSEN Quinn | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
| 13 | GUST Jadyn | 24% | 45% | 26% | 4% | < 1% | - | |
| 14 | MILLIAN Matthew | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 15 | MUSEL Daniel | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 1% | |
| 16 | TAKATA Benjamin | 2% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | BUTTZ John-Henry | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 18 | CELSI Nick L. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 19 | HART Jackson | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 35% | 5% | |
| 20 | OBERLY Nicholas | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
| 21 | MARCUSON Timothy C. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 22 | ARAYE Nasro | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 23 | STEPHENS Rick W. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | STOECKEL Sofia I. | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 25 | KNIGHT Ethan | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
| 26 | TENHUNDFELD Jack | 1% | 8% | 35% | 50% | 7% | - | |
| 27 | RHEA Eric L. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | STONER Shanrael M. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
| 28 | JOHNSON Jay | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% | |
| 30 | JOHNSTONE Mathew | - | - | 6% | 37% | 44% | 13% | |
| 31 | SCHLIEP Anna J. | 3% | 20% | 46% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | FITZGERALD Thomas R. | 7% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 33 | MOHAMED Faisa | 13% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | SHOEMAKER Oliver | 17% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | FRANZ Lisa L. | 20% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | EULENSTEIN Chantal | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | KUHN Jeffrey | 4% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 38 | HONEK Kyle | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | RHEA Heather | 10% | 46% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | JOHNSTONE Natasha | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 41 | HANSON Aimee E. | 8% | 32% | 41% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | STANLEY Patrick | 4% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 43 | JUNK Heather | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.