April Championship and NAC

Div II Men's Saber

Friday, April 12, 2019 at 2:00 PM

Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 ZHOU Matthew R. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 33%
2 SOHN Kevin J. 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 23%
3 WUN William 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 46% 11%
3 YAN Jack P. 100% 99% 94% 75% 40% 10%
5 FLORES Peter D. 100% 99% 90% 66% 34% 10% 1%
6 TANG Brendan J. 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 44% 11%
7 YOUNG Nash 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 66% 22%
8 CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 29% 5%
9 KANG Brandon M. 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 9%
10 DHINGRA Gian K. 100% 100% 99% 90% 61% 20%
11 QUAN Nicholas 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 56% 19%
12 MOSZCZYNSKI Adam 100% 100% 98% 91% 69% 35% 9%
13 WINKLER Lucas G. 100% 100% 98% 85% 50% 11%
14 LEVIN Mark A. 100% 100% 97% 84% 55% 22% 4%
15 CORNEJO Jeffrey A. 100% 100% 96% 80% 49% 18% 3%
16 DANNULL Linus N. 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 63% 24%
17 MCMANIGAL Matthew L. 100% 100% 99% 88% 55% 14%
18 TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 28%
19 ZU Kevin 100% 100% 99% 92% 64% 22%
20 BARBER Brendan 100% 94% 69% 34% 10% 2% -
21 PORTMANN Stein J. 100% 99% 93% 72% 39% 12% 2%
22 ASHBY Ethan J. 100% 98% 85% 49% 15% 2% -
23 TANG Alex Y. 100% 100% 96% 76% 42% 13% 2%
24 WESLER Logan A. 100% 97% 77% 41% 12% 2% -
25 KADID Mohammed F. 100% 97% 77% 40% 11% 1%
26 NEUHEARDT Peter 100% 98% 75% 34% 7% 1%
27 AUSTIN Adam 100% 100% 99% 94% 75% 40% 10%
28 MORRIS Samuel A. 100% 100% 97% 85% 59% 26% 5%
29 CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. 100% 100% 96% 78% 43% 11%
30 LIU kelly 100% 95% 70% 30% 7% 1%
31 CHEONG Heonjae 100% 100% 97% 81% 49% 17% 3%
32 VILLARREAL Mateo 100% 62% 14% 1% - - -
33 ELIN Adam E. 100% 96% 74% 37% 10% 1% -
34 ERACHSHAW Taras P. 100% 100% 99% 92% 69% 32% 7%
35 KIM Benjamin H. 100% 100% 95% 76% 41% 11% 1%
36 HOUTZ Jackson 100% 90% 59% 23% 5% -
37 MENON Rohan C. 100% 99% 90% 65% 32% 9% 1%
38 COVINGTON Max G. 100% 100% 97% 82% 49% 16% 2%
39 WILDMAN John 100% 100% 96% 78% 43% 12% 1%
40 GILLIGAN Wolff 100% 99% 90% 60% 21% 3%
41 OWENS William 100% 100% 99% 87% 55% 16%
42 FONZO Ian 100% 100% 99% 89% 60% 20%
43 SINGER Carson 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 66% 23%
44 BRUSIE Christopher R. 100% 100% 95% 79% 48% 18% 3%
45 HUDDY Brandon J. 100% 98% 84% 52% 20% 4% -
46 POPE Nico 100% 99% 90% 65% 32% 9% 1%
47 WU Nicholas R. 100% 99% 87% 57% 24% 5% -
47 REBELLO Derek 100% 93% 67% 32% 9% 1% -
49 SHANAHAN Adam E. 100% 99% 93% 72% 39% 12% 2%
50 RAJA Arnav 100% 99% 94% 73% 37% 9%
51 RABINKOV Anthony 100% 95% 71% 32% 8% 1%
52 HASNAH Henry 100% 90% 58% 22% 4% -
53 SUORSA Markus 100% 96% 77% 40% 11% 1%
54 BARBER William S. 100% 99% 90% 65% 31% 9% 1%
55 LE Hayden 100% 98% 86% 56% 24% 6% 1%
56 COTTER Liam 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 58% 17%
57 HUANG Zekai 100% 99% 88% 57% 21% 3% -
58 KOTOV Leonid 100% 81% 42% 13% 2% - -
59 YEN Preston 100% 100% 96% 79% 45% 14% 2%
60 MOORE Evan M. 100% 98% 84% 51% 17% 3% -
61 HUANG Eric 100% 94% 71% 35% 10% 1%
62 BERGER Oliver 100% 100% 94% 68% 29% 5%
63 MENON Rishi 100% 85% 49% 16% 3% -
64 HENNICKE Michael G. 100% 100% 97% 82% 52% 20% 3%
65 LU Evan 100% 76% 37% 10% 2% - -
66 EPSTEIN Henry N. 100% 86% 49% 16% 3% - -
67 PEARSON James G. 100% 69% 29% 7% 1% - -
68 DESAI Drewv D. 100% 99% 92% 68% 32% 6%
69 GREENBAUM Ian L. 100% 71% 28% 5% - -
70 REED Samuel J. 100% 84% 43% 12% 2% - -
71 BRAR Sanjeet 100% 98% 87% 59% 25% 5% -
72 LEITH Jack 100% 84% 43% 12% 1% - -
73 MADRID Derek 100% 86% 52% 21% 5% 1% -
74 LEUNG Matthew 100% 82% 44% 14% 2% - -
75 LEUNG Nathan 100% 46% 10% 1% - - -
76 HICHA Paul R. 100% 96% 73% 38% 12% 2% -
77 SUSANTO Samuel (sammy) 100% 54% 15% 2% - -
78 KILBOURNE Lance 100% 97% 66% 24% 4% - -
79 TIERNO Thomas J. 100% 33% 4% - - -
80 ESPARZA Hilario 100% 72% 29% 6% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.