Glenview Park District - Glenview, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | ELYADERANI Paxon | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 79% |
| 2 | SPINA Joseph B. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 43% | 30% |
| 3 | KARNAS Karol | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% |
| 3 | PRABHAKAR Agasthya | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 5 | ZHENG Jerry | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 6 | KRZYSIAK David F. | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | |
| 7 | SHOUSHA Yassin | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 8 | CHUTKAY Sai Pratham | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 9 | ZHENG Andy | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
| 10 | GINZBURG Adam | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
| 11 | TASKIRAN Mete | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 12 | DAS Roshan | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 13 | MITEV Alexander | 5% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
| 14 | GRAVES Lawson | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 15 | LOISEAU Oscar | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 2% |
| 16 | VUILLEMIN Gregoire | 13% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 17 | BORISENKO Samuel | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | - |
| 18 | FRANGER Max | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | MISHRA Milan B. | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 20 | ZIEGLER John | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 21 | BURGESS Brian | - | 7% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 2% |
| 22 | THOMPSON North D. | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 22 | PETROVICH Alexandar | 15% | 43% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 24 | PATEL Aayan | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 25 | DHAL Leon | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | WILLIAMS Logan | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 27 | SHAFFER Tyler | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 28 | OUARDI Max | 11% | 39% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 29 | SWENSON Diego | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.