Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
| 2 | CHANG Jeremy | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 3 | FUKUDA Brando | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 3 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 3% |
| 5 | FEDELI Francesco | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
| 6 | DESERANNO Leander | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
| 7 | BIELER Mason | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 8 | TOOMRE Kai | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 9 | SIMONOV Timofey | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
| 10 | YANG Charles | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 31% | 11% |
| 11 | ZHENG Marcus | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 39% | 8% |
| 12 | MO Ethan | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
| 13 | TANG Royce | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 4% |
| 14 | CHEN Hanson | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 15 | JIN Andy | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | SUAREZ David | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 18 | WANDJI Noah | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 19 | LI Bradley | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 20 | HUA Aaron | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | DOELL Ethan | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 22 | QU Zhida (richard) | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 23 | HOU Gaven | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | REN Ryan | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 25 | WU Thomas | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | CHENG Logan | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 27 | MORROW Sean | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
| 28 | PARK William | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | HAYES Stewart | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 30 | YAN Rian | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 31 | POPOKH Luca | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | QIAN Henry | 25% | 41% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | ZHAO Nathan | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 54% |
| 34 | GRIGORIEV Michael | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 35 | QIAN Zekai | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 36 | CHANG Jonathan | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 36% | 8% |
| 37 | HUANG Jinyao | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 38 | WANG Ancen | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 39 | KIM Andrew | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | WEI JR Shan | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 41 | ZHOU Alex | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 42 | XIE Jayden | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 43 | HE Ryan | 9% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 44 | XU Nathan | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
| 45 | LU Alex | - | - | < 1% | 4% | 17% | 40% | 39% |
| 46 | BRITTNELL Nicolas | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | YU ShiLin (Harry) | 7% | 31% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 48 | PAULUS Gregory | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | LU Hansen | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 50 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 51 | SHAW eric | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | ZHAI Derrick | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 53 | KO Caleb | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 54 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | WANG Xiuqi(Arthur) | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 56 | KOE Declan | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 57 | SEVOSTYANOV Timofey | 39% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 58 | MARCUS Vincent | 46% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 59 | LIN Wilson | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 59 | FAYVUSOVICH Emmanuel | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | SAMIR Rehan | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 62 | YU Rainger | 53% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 62 | PACK Lindsey | 23% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.