Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 18% |
2 | CHANG Jeremy | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
3 | FUKUDA Brando | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
3 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | 3% |
5 | FEDELI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% |
6 | DESERANNO Leander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
7 | BIELER Mason | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
8 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
9 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% |
10 | YANG Charles | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 11% |
11 | ZHENG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 8% |
12 | MO Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
13 | TANG Royce | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 4% |
14 | CHEN Hanson | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
15 | JIN Andy | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
16 | SUAREZ David | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
17 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 23% |
18 | WANDJI Noah | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
19 | LI Bradley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
20 | HUA Aaron | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
21 | DOELL Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
22 | QU Zhida (richard) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | - |
23 | HOU Gaven | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
24 | REN Ryan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
25 | WU Thomas | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
26 | CHENG Logan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
27 | MORROW Sean | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 36% | 8% |
28 | PARK William | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
29 | HAYES Stewart | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
30 | YAN Rian | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
31 | POPOKH Luca | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
32 | QIAN Henry | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
33 | ZHAO Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
34 | GRIGORIEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
35 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
36 | CHANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 8% |
37 | HUANG Jinyao | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
38 | WANG Ancen | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
39 | KIM Andrew | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
40 | WEI JR Shan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
41 | ZHOU Alex | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
42 | XIE Jayden | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
43 | HE Ryan | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
44 | XU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | 1% |
45 | LU Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 39% |
46 | BRITTNELL Nicolas | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - |
47 | YU ShiLin (Harry) | 100% | 93% | 62% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
48 | PAULUS Gregory | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
49 | LU Hansen | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
50 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 23% | 5% | - |
51 | SHAW eric | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
52 | ZHAI Derrick | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
53 | KO Caleb | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - |
54 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
55 | WANG Xiuqi(Arthur) | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
56 | KOE Declan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
57 | SEVOSTYANOV Timofey | 100% | 61% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
58 | MARCUS Vincent | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
59 | LIN Wilson | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - |
59 | FAYVUSOVICH Emmanuel | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
61 | SAMIR Rehan | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
62 | YU Rainger | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
62 | PACK Lindsey | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.