Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHUNG Kwangsuk | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 2 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
| 3 | KISSINGFORD John F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% |
| 5 | HABALA Peter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% |
| 6 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 15% |
| 7 | LAWRENCE John W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 20% |
| 8 | CHEN David A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 5% |
| 9 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 10 | CAMERON Matt W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 4% |
| 11 | MARTOS Darwin C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 9% | - |
| 12 | GRAJALES Nestor L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 13% |
| 12 | ESTELL Oscar M. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 14 | GRISWOLD Doug | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | POWERS Douglas A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 16 | STRICKLAND Michael C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 52% | 14% | 1% |
| 17 | TANG Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 22% |
| 18 | GROSS Stephen R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 22% | 1% |
| 19 | PASHBY Stephen N. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 20 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 30% | 5% | - | - |
| 21 | WALL Aaron J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 22 | FADL Omar | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 23 | WILBERT Matt | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 24 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 25 | SCHREIBER Gyula S. | 100% | 99% | 79% | 24% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | GLADNICK Michael J. | 100% | 92% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | NEWSON Frank | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 28 | HAGOPIAN Mitchell | 100% | 72% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 29 | ALLAN Peter L. | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 30 | JONES Bryan T. | 100% | 92% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 31 | ZEISS Gary M. | 100% | 95% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 33 | LEE David S. | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 34 | MELCHIOR Donald L. | 100% | 66% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 34 | HAN Jae | 100% | 14% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.