Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | YIN Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% |
2 | LEE REGINA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
3 | PROFIS Liora | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
3 | LEE Claire | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 20% | |
5 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 46% | |
6 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 44% |
7 | YILMAZ Pinar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | |
8 | SHIV Avni | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 38% |
9 | WANG Jessie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% |
10 | STERR Isabella M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% | |
11 | LUO Amy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% |
11 | ZHAN Nancy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% |
13 | CAFASSO Natalya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
14 | SU Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 48% | 10% |
15 | PHUKAN Indra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
16 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% |
17 | KUMAR Eva | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
18 | QIU Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 19% |
19 | WATTANAKIT Anda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
20 | WANG Ziqi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
21 | LISCUM Vivian | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
22 | MOLLINIER Anais | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 11% | |
23 | NIX Reagan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
24 | DEPOMMIER Isabelle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
25 | HOY Emmarose | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
26 | RICHARDSON Meredith | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
27 | MONOVA Lilyana | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
28 | BOROTKO Katerina | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
29 | FRANGER Macy | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
30 | WANG Victoria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% | 2% |
31 | SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle | 100% | 98% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
32 | CUEVA Viola | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
33 | GUO Luxi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 5% |
34 | IYER Ishana | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 17% | 1% |
35 | MISHIMA Audrey | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
36 | LEE Gloria | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
37 | BEATIE Isabella M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
38 | SUN Hanya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% |
39 | FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
40 | MCQUEEN Morgan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
41 | LEE Camilla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
42 | CARRIER Meredith | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 67% | 19% | |
43 | YOUNG VIVIAN | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% | |
44 | WRIGHT Madison | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | - | |
45 | GUAN Isabella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% | 3% |
46 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
47 | SOLDATOVA Sophia | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
48 | JI Catherine | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
49 | BALAKRISHNAN Trisha | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
50 | SUN Zeyu | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
51 | WANG Sara | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
52 | HANKINS Morgan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
53 | TALANDZEVICIUS Sophia | 100% | 96% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | |
54 | BI Michelle | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | |
55 | HALE Avery | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | |
56 | SHAYAKHMETOVA Suzanna | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
57 | MENKIN Kate | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
58 | GANSER Nicole | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
59 | YOUSSEF Caroline | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 4% | - | |
60 | WANG Ziqiao | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 5% | - | |
61 | TISMENSKY Avital | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 5% | - | |
62 | TAM Connie | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
63 | QI Julieanne | 100% | 96% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
64 | KANASKAR Ila | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
65 | SCHMITT Harper | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 8% | |
66 | NEELAM Navya | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
67 | LIN Ariel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 5% | |
68 | MARTINEZ Christina | 100% | 86% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
69 | NGUYEN Ella | 100% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - | |
70 | DESAI Ela | 100% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
71 | CHADDA Farah | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
72 | LY Hannah | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
73 | WOOLF Fredrika | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
73 | ZHONG Isabell | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
75 | CHEN Alina | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
76 | YAO Chloe | 100% | 91% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | |
77 | LEE Kate | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
78 | WU Jessica | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | - |
79 | KUPPUSAMY Mahaa | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
80 | PEI Claire | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
81 | ZHANG Jane | 100% | 61% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
82 | WORKNEH Lulit | 100% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
82 | XU Serena | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
84 | KROPP Anne | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
85 | XU Jessica | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
86 | ELTERMAN Kate | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
87 | FANG jenna kim | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
88 | TISMENSKY Abigail | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
88 | STERN Savannah | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
90 | SCHOR Elisabeth | 100% | 99% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - |
91 | OLSON Olivia | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
92 | WANG Sijia | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
93 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | 100% | 90% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
94 | TISHKOVA-ROBERTS Daria | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.