Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CANO-DIOSA Rosa M. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% | |
2 | ZAFFT Sharrie A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 46% | 22% |
3 | MARSH Janet L. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
3 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% | |
5 | QUINLAN Nicole P. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
6 | LEIGHTON Louise N. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 2% | |
7 | SCHMID Carola K. | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
8 | BLOOMER Suzanne | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
9 | NANTON SHYAMALA M. | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | < 1% | |
10 | ASHER Valerie | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 8% |
11 | HABERKERN Kundry E. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
12 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 34% | 5% | |
13 | CHIMIENTI Michele | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
14 | FORD Cristina E. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
15 | MONTOYA Amy C. | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 14% | |
15 | GORDET Cristina G. | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 42% | 12% | |
17 | GLOVER Cynthia E. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
18 | HUTCHINSON Valerie A. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% |
19 | ZOLINSKI Sarah E. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
20 | TAYENGCO Michele T. | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
21 | TADLOCK Christine M. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
22 | BRISK Angelica A. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
23 | INAMDAR Nina S. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
24 | GROENING Joanne | 11% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
25 | HEINRICH Eva | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
26 | BOWEN Victoria M. | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
27 | CHRISS Rhonda | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
28 | FINNEGAN Ellen M. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
29 | CAREY Michele S. | 2% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
30 | BROWN Trish M. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
31 | WOLF Lisa A. | - | < 1% | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% | |
32 | RIOS Donna B. | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
33 | MCMENAMIN Dianna S. | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
34 | MOHEBI Sue | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 2% | |
35 | CHOY Ida | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
36 | BYRON Karen J. | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
37 | POULIQUEN Karine S. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
38 | KLINE julia | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
39 | FREY Alison | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
40 | MANDEL Helen (Jenner) | 19% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
41 | BOWIE Charlotta | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
42 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 6% | 31% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | |
43 | CHRISTIAN Lyn T. | 1% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
44 | GIFFORD Sally | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
45 | TAYLOR Francine M. | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
46 | SANCHEZ-EMDEN Marta | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
47 | JEANDHEUR Carole A. | 11% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
48 | TELLES Anna | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 8% | - | |
49 | WILKENS Patricia A. | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
50 | RICH Caroline B. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
51 | ROWLAND May | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
52 | COMES Rita | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
53 | RADICH Lori G. | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
54 | GALES Henri H. | - | 6% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
55 | REAM Jann L. | 39% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
56 | NOLLNER Jennifer R. | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
57 | JULIEN Erica | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - | |
58 | GROCE Linda J. | 65% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.