Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CANO-DIOSA Rosa M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% | |
| 2 | ZAFFT Sharrie A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 22% |
| 3 | MARSH Janet L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
| 3 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | |
| 5 | QUINLAN Nicole P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 6 | LEIGHTON Louise N. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 24% | 2% | |
| 7 | SCHMID Carola K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 8% | |
| 8 | BLOOMER Suzanne | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
| 9 | NANTON SHYAMALA M. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | < 1% | |
| 10 | ASHER Valerie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 8% |
| 11 | HABERKERN Kundry E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
| 12 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | 5% | |
| 13 | CHIMIENTI Michele | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 14 | FORD Cristina E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
| 15 | MONTOYA Amy C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 14% | |
| 15 | GORDET Cristina G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | 12% | |
| 17 | GLOVER Cynthia E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 18 | HUTCHINSON Valerie A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
| 19 | ZOLINSKI Sarah E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
| 20 | TAYENGCO Michele T. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 1% | |
| 21 | TADLOCK Christine M. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | BRISK Angelica A. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 23 | INAMDAR Nina S. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 24 | GROENING Joanne | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 25 | HEINRICH Eva | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 26 | BOWEN Victoria M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 27 | CHRISS Rhonda | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | FINNEGAN Ellen M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 29 | CAREY Michele S. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 2% | |
| 30 | BROWN Trish M. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | WOLF Lisa A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% | |
| 32 | RIOS Donna B. | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | MCMENAMIN Dianna S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | MOHEBI Sue | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 2% | |
| 35 | CHOY Ida | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | BYRON Karen J. | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | POULIQUEN Karine S. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 38 | KLINE julia | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | FREY Alison | 100% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 40 | MANDEL Helen (Jenner) | 100% | 81% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | BOWIE Charlotta | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 42 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 100% | 94% | 63% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | CHRISTIAN Lyn T. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 44 | GIFFORD Sally | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 45 | TAYLOR Francine M. | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | SANCHEZ-EMDEN Marta | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 47 | JEANDHEUR Carole A. | 100% | 89% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | TELLES Anna | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% | - | |
| 49 | WILKENS Patricia A. | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | RICH Caroline B. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 2% | |
| 51 | ROWLAND May | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 52 | COMES Rita | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 53 | RADICH Lori G. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 54 | GALES Henri H. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 55 | REAM Jann L. | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 56 | NOLLNER Jennifer R. | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | JULIEN Erica | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | GROCE Linda J. | 100% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.