Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MATHIEU Adam | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
2 | BRAVO Kenji U. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% | |
3 | KANESHIGE Brian K. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
3 | ORTS Lucas E. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 46% | 36% | |
5 | OLIVARES Marcello G. | - | - | 2% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 25% |
6 | MITBERG Gregory W. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
7 | PAIK Joon K. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
8 | GASSNER Ethan I. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
9 | MOELIS Samuel (Sam) D. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 45% | 21% |
10 | KUMBLA Sidarth | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
11 | KNODT Julian P. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
12 | LIU Niles J. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 32% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
13 | WOODS Jack H. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
14 | MARINO Joseph A. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
15 | CHEN James P. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
16 | GRIFFITH Jordan | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% |
17 | SHIN Philip D. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 41% | 26% | |
18 | WANG Brian S. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
19 | LEVY Jasper | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
20 | YEE Maxwell J. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
21 | LOUIE Bryce | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 6% |
22 | LIU Justin | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
23 | HOSSFELD Finn E. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
24 | ZHANG Daniel D. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
25 | ZHENG Andrew R. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
26 | BINDER Zachary (Zach) B. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
27 | CHUNG Andrew N. | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
28 | HODGES Carter F. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
29 | EMMER Chase T. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
30 | VOGLER Justin K. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
31 | SONG Lawrence (Larry) | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
32 | ANDRADE Nicholas H. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 41% | 33% | 8% |
33 | LIAO Jun Heng (James) | - | - | 2% | 18% | 50% | 30% | |
34 | BOURTIS James S. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
35 | YANG Adam | 1% | 14% | 33% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
36 | YU Eric W. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
37 | HOLMES Stuart S. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
38 | BARMANN Samuel (Sam) I. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
39 | PARKINS Benjamin B. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
40 | SHAFAIE Kaveh | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
41 | HUANG Bin | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 22% |
42 | KATAYAMA Kevin | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 1% |
42 | TIERNEY David A. | - | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
44 | CANNON Caiden C. | 6% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
45 | RANADIVE Rishi R. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
46 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
47 | DOBBINS Evan W. | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | - | - | |
48 | GRUBER Samuel T. | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
49 | LU Kerry L. | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
50 | TULYAG Fyze A. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
51 | JOHNSON Aidan J. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
52 | BRATTON Jack S. | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
53 | DICKSON Farr R. | - | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
54 | OURSLER Jack | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
54 | XIAO Ethan J. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
56 | HAMILTON Bogdan A. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
56 | GRIFFIN John O. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
58 | LEVIN Nestor R. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
59 | DAYTON Draper | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | |
60 | PAIK Hyun K. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
61 | PALAZZOLO William J. | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 3% | - | |
62 | DANIEL Ashton | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
63 | DORITY Philip S. | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
64 | PELOSKY Ryan F. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
65 | BLUTT Emerson B. | 24% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - | |
66 | SCARPA Ryan N. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
67 | JOHNSON Cole B. | 18% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
68 | NDIAYE Edriss G. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
69 | PRILUTSKY David B. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
70 | XIAO Enoch A. | 3% | 31% | 40% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
71 | IRVINE Jonathan J. | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
72 | HERGAN Daniel | 20% | 38% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
73 | KO Brian J. | 11% | 35% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
74 | SHAFAIE Ali | 7% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
75 | MARTINEZ Donavyn E. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
76 | AYUPOV Ilya | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
77 | BAE Anthony | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
78 | CHENG Thomas C. | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
79 | UM Ethan A. | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
80 | MCKENNA Joseph (Owen) O. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
81 | URODOVSKIKH Evan | 14% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
82 | BARLETTA Joseph | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
83 | GILBERT-GOLDSTEIN Avery E. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
84 | SNYTSHEUVEL John Evan (Evan) | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
85 | THAI William | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
86 | ROMANOV Michael | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
87 | CHIN Jason Y. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
88 | NOVACHENKO Nestor V. | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
88 | CHOI Ethan L. | 10% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
90 | JACKSON Stephen M. | 62% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
91 | LIU Kevin B. | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
92 | FIELD Miles | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
93 | ZHAO Jason L. | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
94 | LI Brandon H. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
95 | YU Vinni | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
95 | OH Samuel H. | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
97 | HU Oliver W. | 3% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
98 | LEE Benjamin H. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
99 | RYAN Francis D. | 81% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.