Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LICHTEN Keith H. | V V D V V V | V V V V V V | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
2 | O'LOUGHLIN Chris S. | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.9 | 6 | +0.1 |
3 | HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
3 | LOEFFLER Carl E. | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
5 | LANG Markus | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
6 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
7 | HAYENGA Gary M. | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
8 | TAYLOR Daryl J. | V D D V V D | V V V V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
9 | SUVEG Bela | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
10 | ROSTAL Scott E. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
11 | MECHKOV Iliya | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
12 | HITCHCOCK David | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
13 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
14 | SKOPIK Jr August | V V V D V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
15 | SCOTT George R. | V V V D V D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
16 | KURITZ Marc M. | D V D D D V | V V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
17 | PERKA Michael | V D V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
18 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
19 | MARSH Timothy G. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
20 | BRUCE II Ommer E. | V V D V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
21 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | D V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
22 | POULIQUEN Benoit (Ben) | V V V D V D | V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
23 | STEWART Robert | V D V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
24 | NEALE James H. | V D V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
25 | WHEELER Mark C. | D V V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
26 | MCTIGUE J. Michael | D V D V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
27 | NGUYEN Cuong T. | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
28 | SWANSON Dave | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
29 | BAILEY Creston P. | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
30 | WATRALL Rick | V D V D V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
31 | GUMAGAY Paul | D V V V D D | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
32 | OCHS Bradley C. | D D V V V D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
33 | PHO Eric | V V V V V V | D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
34 | KING Charles M. | V V V V D V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
35 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | V D V V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
36 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | V V D V V V | D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
37 | BARREIRO Darren | V V V V D D | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
38 | FOLEY Kevin | V D V V V D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
39 | FRANK Fred | D V D V V V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
40 | LIPP Robert (Bob) J. | D V D V V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
41 | FLINT James E. | V V V D V D | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
42 | ABELE Chris | V D V V D V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
43 | BLAKLEY Dwain | V D V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
44 | DYER CJ | D V D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
45 | TRIFILETTI Lawrence T. | V D V V D V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
46 | DESAMOURS Georges H. | D V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
47 | SCHULTZ Douglas B. | D V V V D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
48 | YAO Shun | D D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
49 | SUMLER Jeffery | V D D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
50 | WALLACE Patric | V V D D D V | V D | 5.0 | 3 | -2.0 |
51 | BECK Brian C. | V V D D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
52 | KAUFMAN Joel H. | D D V D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
53 | PARY Theodore | V V D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
54 | TOOMEY Brian L. | V D D V V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
55 | KUHN Jeffrey | V V D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
56 | CLINEFELTER Dennis S. | D V V D D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
57 | JOHNSON Jeff | V V D D D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
58 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | D D V D V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
59 | TYSON Julian F. | D D D D V V | V D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
60 | ROOD Alex | V D V D D D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
61 | NEWSOME James L. | D D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
62 | PARTE Aidan | D V D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
63 | SIMMONS Matthew C. | D V D D D D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
64 | WALKER William H. | D D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
65 | DAVIS Andrew | D V D V V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
66 | GELNAW William (Gypsy) H. | V D D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
67 | KLEIN Johannes | V D D V V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
68 | WEINGARTEN Solomon (Sol) | D D V V D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
69 | ZHENG Brian | D V V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
70 | SWANN William A. | D V V D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
70 | KRUGER Mark | D D D V D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
72 | SPAHN Jeff | V D D V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
73 | SNYDER John W. | D D V D V D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
74 | LIPTON Michael D. | V V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
75 | RESS Michael A. | D V D V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
76 | DUFFY Gerald | V D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
77 | GROSS Louis A. | D D V V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
78 | RYAN Christopher | D D V D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
79 | JEFFERIES Jonathan J. | V D D D D D | D | 3.8 | 1 | -2.8 |
80 | WEBER Dick | D D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
81 | KAIN Brad | D D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
82 | RIFKIND Neil | V D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
83 | SCHWARY Irv | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
84 | THORESON Gary C. | D V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
85 | POMPIAN Mark | D D D D V D | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
86 | REID Michael | V D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
87 | LEONARDINI Barry M. | D D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
88 | KING Richard (Dick) M. | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
89 | BARAFF David | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
90 | CAAMANO Leo P. | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
91 | SATTERWHITE William W. | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
91 | KRICK Jon | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
93 | KLUCZYNSKI Mike k. | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
94 | WILLIAMS Richard | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
95 | CHUANG Kenneth H. | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
96 | KATOPES Peter | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.