Boston Fencing club - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LI Richard | V V V V D V | V V V V V V | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 2 | GRAHAM Roy J. | D V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
| 3 | WU Alexander | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 3 | SIMA Congyu Josh | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 5 | KAO Castor T. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 6 | BING Charles | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 7 | MIALL Steven A. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 8 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 9 | LIN Michael | D V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 10 | ACHILOV Sayid | V D V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 11 | LIN James G. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 12 | LI Eric | V D V V D V | V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 13 | ZHAI Jeffrey | V D D V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
| 14 | CHENG Ethan | V V D V V D | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 15 | LI Arvin | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 16 | LI Aaron | D V D V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 17 | GUO Sean | V V V V V V | D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 18 | PO Oliver | V V V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 19 | TANG Terry | V V V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 20 | JIANG Owen | V D V D V V | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 21 | TAHOUN Mostafa | D V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 22 | KOVACS Wyatt | V V V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 23 | LIU Derek | D V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 24 | LEE Jonah | V V D V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 25 | MENG Zhaoyi | V D V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 26 | SONG Noel | V V D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 27 | LEE Brendan | V V D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 28 | GONG Benjamin | D D D V V V | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 29 | XU Ethan | D D V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 30 | FAN Xikai | V D D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 31 | SHEN Mingxuan | D D V D D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 32 | BUCKLEY-JONES Henry C. | D D D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 33 | WANG Mason | V D V D V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 34 | YOON DYLAN | D V V D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 35 | KAPOOR Aayan | D V D V V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 36 | SHAO Eric | D D V V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 37 | GUO Justin | V V D V D D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 38 | LEE Eugene | V D D V V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 39 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | V V V D D D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 40 | ZHAO Adam | V V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 41 | KLOTZ Isaiah | V V D D D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 42 | ZHENG Harrison | D V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 43 | FENG Michael | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 44 | RIPA Joseph K. | D D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 45 | LI Ayren | D D D D V D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 46 | GREENLEAF Paul | D D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 47 | YU Stephen | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 48 | WUN Jonathan | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 49 | GE Daniel | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 50 | XU Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 51 | WANG Rory | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 52 | ZHAO Brandon | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 53 | CHANDRAMOHAN Aran | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 54 | HAZLETT Grady | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 55 | BRATTAIN Trey | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 56 | SMITH Liam | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.