Boston Fencing club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% |
2 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 69% |
3 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
3 | STANLEY Mason B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% |
5 | GONG Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 19% |
6 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% |
7 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% |
8 | DU Samuel R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 30% |
9 | MIALL Steven A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 12% |
10 | LEE Chris | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
11 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 18% |
12 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 27% |
13 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 31% |
14 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% | 14% |
15 | PO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 8% |
16 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 35% | 5% |
17 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 30% |
18 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 30% |
19 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 36% | 5% |
20 | YOON DYLAN | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 9% | - |
21 | GUO Sean | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 39% | 6% |
22 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% |
23 | LI Arvin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 57% | 15% | 1% |
24 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 100% | 99% | 77% | 30% | 2% |
25 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 27% | 3% |
26 | ACHILOV Sayid | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 7% |
27 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 44% |
28 | BUCKLEY-JONES Henry C. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
29 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 92% | 54% | 14% | 1% |
30 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | 25% | 3% |
31 | LIU Derek | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | 1% |
32 | FAN Xikai | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
33 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 22% | 1% |
34 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
35 | LANG Dong Lin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 38% | 3% |
36 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 20% | 1% |
37 | SHEN Mingxuan | 100% | 80% | 35% | 6% | - | - |
38 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
39 | WANG Mason | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% | 2% |
40 | KOVACS Wyatt | 100% | 100% | 92% | 50% | 12% | 1% |
41 | MCLEAN Miles K. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 17% | 2% |
42 | WU Michael | 100% | 96% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - |
43 | SEEDS Edward T. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
44 | GUO Justin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 25% | 2% |
45 | TSAI Max W. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 58% | 17% | 1% |
45 | WANG Rory | 100% | 68% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
47 | LI Ayren | 100% | 95% | 66% | 19% | 2% | - |
47 | BOUSSY Luciano | 100% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
49 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
50 | DENG Kenny | 100% | 74% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
51 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 94% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - |
52 | LEVIN Michael | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
53 | XU Ethan | 100% | 72% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
54 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
55 | HAZLETT Grady | 100% | 44% | 5% | - | - | - |
56 | CANEDO James | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - |
57 | WUN Jonathan | 100% | 53% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
58 | SUN Ryan | 100% | 67% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
59 | POPE Alexander | 100% | 69% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
60 | CHESSA Giovanni | 100% | 90% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - |
61 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 3% | - |
62 | CHANDRAMOHAN Aran | 100% | 71% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
63 | DOHONEY Tommy | 100% | 49% | 4% | - | - | - |
64 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 90% | 57% | 18% | 1% |
65 | GREENLEAF Paul | 100% | 90% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - |
66 | XU Ethan | 100% | 79% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
67 | GARDINER Luke J. | 100% | 75% | 27% | 3% | - | - |
68 | YU Stephen | 100% | 77% | 26% | 2% | - | - |
69 | BISHOP Henry | 100% | 57% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
70 | FRANK Amir | 100% | 63% | 8% | - | - | - |
71 | EBERMAN Henry | 100% | 48% | 7% | - | - | - |
72 | PILIPSKI Aiden | 100% | 81% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.