Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | MUGA Boris | V V D V V V | V V V V V | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
2 | LI Brian X | V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
3 | TODREAS Simon | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
3 | YAO Shun | D V D V D V | V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
5 | O'HARA Keegan J. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
6 | KAEDING Alexander (Alex) B. | D V V D V D | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
7 | DYER Carson C. | D D V V V D | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
8 | SMITH Jackson | V D V D D D | V V V D | 5.1 | 2 | -3.1 |
9 | INSLER Ethan C. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
9 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
11 | XIAO Zherui | V V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
12 | KASTENBERG Leo M. | V D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
13 | WESTMAAS Jonathan | V D V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
14 | LAWLER Aidan | V D V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
15 | CHU Ian | V V D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
16 | GOLDMAN Rami | D D V V D D | V V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
17 | SMAY II Joseph E. | V V D V V V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
18 | CHUANG Kenneth H. | V V V V D V | D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
19 | RYAN Christopher | V V D V V | D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
20 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | V V D D V V | D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
21 | WISNIEWSKI Bart | D V D V V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
22 | RYAN Seth C. | D D V V V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
23 | HOLDERNESS Landon | D V V V D | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
24 | BEITTEL David F. | V V D D D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
25 | FONG Joseph M. | D V V D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
26 | BURCH Tristan H. | D D V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
27 | BARAFF David | D V V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
27 | RHEA Eric L. | V D D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
29 | YOUNGS Benjamin | D D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
30 | WILLIAMS Richard | V D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
31 | PARTE Aidan | D D D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
32 | KIM Dan | D D D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
33 | SCHWARY Irv | D D V D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
34 | SATTERWHITE William W. | D V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
35 | CAAMANO Leo P. | D D D V D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
36 | DYER CJ | V D D D D D | D | 4.5 | 1 | -3.5 |
37 | KUHN Jeffrey | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
38 | POMPIAN Mark | D D V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
38 | WEBER Dick | D D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
40 | LIPTON Michael D. | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
41 | GRAVIS Martin V. | D D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
---|---|---|
Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.