Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MUGA Boris | V V D V V V | V V V V V | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 2 | LI Brian X | V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 3 | TODREAS Simon | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 3 | YAO Shun | D V D V D V | V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 5 | O'HARA Keegan J. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 6 | KAEDING Alexander (Alex) B. | D V V D V D | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 7 | DYER Carson C. | D D V V V D | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 8 | SMITH Jackson | V D V D D D | V V V D | 5.1 | 2 | -3.1 |
| 9 | INSLER Ethan C. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 9 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 11 | XIAO Zherui | V V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 12 | KASTENBERG Leo M. | V D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 13 | WESTMAAS Jonathan | V D V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 14 | LAWLER Aidan | V D V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 15 | CHU Ian | V V D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 16 | GOLDMAN Rami | D D V V D D | V V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 17 | SMAY II Joseph E. | V V D V V V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 18 | CHUANG Kenneth H. | V V V V D V | D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
| 19 | RYAN Christopher | V V D V V | D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 20 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | V V D D V V | D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 21 | WISNIEWSKI Bart | D V D V V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 22 | RYAN Seth C. | D D V V V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 23 | HOLDERNESS Landon | D V V V D | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 24 | BEITTEL David F. | V V D D D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 25 | FONG Joseph M. | D V V D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 26 | BURCH Tristan H. | D D V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 27 | BARAFF David | D V V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 27 | RHEA Eric L. | V D D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 29 | YOUNGS Benjamin | D D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 30 | WILLIAMS Richard | V D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 31 | PARTE Aidan | D D D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 32 | KIM Dan | D D D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 33 | SCHWARY Irv | D D V D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 34 | SATTERWHITE William W. | D V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 35 | CAAMANO Leo P. | D D D V D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 36 | DYER CJ | V D D D D D | D | 4.5 | 1 | -3.5 |
| 37 | KUHN Jeffrey | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 38 | POMPIAN Mark | D D V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 38 | WEBER Dick | D D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 40 | LIPTON Michael D. | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 41 | GRAVIS Martin V. | D D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.