Fore Kicks Sports Complex - Taunton, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Daniel D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% |
| 2 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 3 | ONIK Elijah T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% |
| 3 | GONG Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 17% | |
| 5 | LEE Chris | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% | |
| 6 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 23% | 2% |
| 7 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 11% |
| 8 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 25% | 2% | |
| 9 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 68% | |
| 10 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 33% | |
| 11 | BARTEL Jacob L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 28% | 3% |
| 12 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% | 13% |
| 13 | PO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
| 14 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% |
| 15 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 11% | |
| 16 | THADHANI Elio | 100% | 87% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | HE Xiangrui | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 4% | < 1% |
| 18 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 25% | |
| 19 | LANG Dong Lin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 88% | 49% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | MCLEAN Miles K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | 7% | |
| 21 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% | 18% | |
| 22 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 33% | 3% |
| 23 | MIALL Steven A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 56% | 14% | |
| 24 | LI Arvin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
| 25 | DU Samuel R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | |
| 25 | LIU Derek | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 27 | JI Aidan Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | 10% | |
| 28 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 90% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 29 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 17% | |
| 29 | CHESSA Giovanni | 100% | 88% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 16% | 1% |
| 32 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | WANG mason | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | MILLER Aidan A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 35 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 45% | 11% | 1% | |
| 36 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 37 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | WANG Rory | 100% | 63% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | TIAN allen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 7% |
| 40 | WU Michael | 100% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | SHEN Mingxuan | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 43 | JIN Dennis H. | 100% | 91% | 52% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 44 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 93% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 45 | DONG sean | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 46 | CANEDO James | 100% | 43% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 47 | BOUSSY Luciano | 100% | 92% | 57% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | LI Ayren | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | KONG Luculentus X. | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | GARDINER Luke J. | 100% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 51 | FRANK Amir | 100% | 72% | 10% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | HOLCOMB Cedric | 100% | 75% | 17% | 1% | - | - | |
| 53 | BILODEAU Leo | 100% | 61% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | MCQUIDE elliot | 100% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 55 | LAO Kevin | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | LACHAPELLE Cole | 100% | 94% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 57 | SUTARIA Julian | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 38% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.