Pasadena Convention Center - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SOHN Kevin J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 69% |
| 2 | XU William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 43% |
| 3 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 3 | HOLZ Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | |
| 5 | LO Konnor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 6 | YANG Ziyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% |
| 7 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% | 4% |
| 8 | ZUBATIY Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | |
| 9 | ERMAKOV Lev | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 42% | |
| 10 | HOLZ William A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% |
| 11 | HOUTZ Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 30% |
| 12 | BEITEL Noah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 6% | |
| 13 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 14% | |
| 14 | WANG Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | |
| 15 | VO Minh Q. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | 15% | 1% | |
| 16 | BYON Adrian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 27% | 4% | |
| 17 | QIU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% | 11% |
| 18 | LIM William J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 14% | |
| 19 | COVINGTON Max G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | 11% |
| 20 | PATIL Aaryan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | 5% |
| 21 | WANG Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
| 22 | YAN Kevin | 100% | 90% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | CAISSE Simon B. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 24 | SCHERER Max | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 25 | JAIN Aniket | 100% | 91% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | BYON Julian | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 27 | CHAN Aidan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 28 | STONE Esmond A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 58% | 10% |
| 29 | GUO Ethan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 30 | KUMAR Sachit | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 31 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 32 | DUDNICK Christian | 100% | 89% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 27% | 2% |
| 34 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 35 | TAO Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 8% | |
| 35 | KLEIMAN Jakob | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 37 | VELTZ Tyler J. | 100% | 95% | 68% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | RAMANAN Govind | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 39 | FERGUSON Constantine | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 40 | KROON Lucas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | 5% | |
| 41 | BARRIOS Diego | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 42 | ZHAO Zhiyu | 100% | 76% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 43 | FOX Gavin | 100% | 94% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 44 | RICHARDS Corey | 100% | 92% | 58% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | KANG Evan | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 46 | WONG James T. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 47 | MUNGUIA Nathan | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | CHEN Zejia E. | 100% | 71% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 49 | ZENG Vito | 100% | 62% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 50 | KWON Junwoo | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | TSAI Michael T. | 100% | 94% | 64% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | HERRERA aragon | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 53 | KIM Evan | 100% | 55% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | WANG HongXi | 100% | 70% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 55 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | MAX Jake | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 57 | HARAHAN Tate | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 58 | SILVA Joaquin | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 59 | CHAN Elliott | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.