DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHELANSKI Isaac | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 68% | |
| 2 | MAZUR Daniil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | |
| 3 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 11% | |
| 3 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 59% | 9% | |
| 5 | HADDAD Justin R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 73% | |
| 5 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 36% | |
| 7 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% |
| 8 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 10% | |
| 9 | CAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | 7% |
| 10 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
| 11 | BROWN Joshua (Josh) A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 9% |
| 12 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | |
| 13 | LI Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 12% |
| 14 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | JORDAN Anton | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 6% |
| 17 | DUAN Eric | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 7% | - | |
| 18 | CHAWLA Armaan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 30% | |
| 19 | WRIGHT Ezra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% |
| 20 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 21 | ZHANG Caden | 100% | 97% | 69% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | SINGH Aryaman | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 9% | - | |
| 23 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 95% | 66% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 24 | SINGH Ravin | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 25 | DOAN Joseph M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 21% |
| 26 | MILLSON Daniel | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 27 | MARTINEZ Joshua | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 18% | 2% | |
| 28 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 20% | 2% | |
| 29 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 83% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | BANNEN Nicholas | 100% | 94% | 63% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | COLLEY Joshua | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 18% | 2% | |
| 32 | SO Lorenzo | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 33 | SINFUEGO Adrian | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | FOREST Sung | 100% | 90% | 50% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | HARDY Tristan L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 37% | 3% | |
| 36 | WALTHER Bryan M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 8% | |
| 37 | DAN Rex | 100% | 76% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 38 | KANG Eunwoo | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | PALAMARCHUK Matthew | 100% | 91% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | MEGGERS Davin | 100% | 90% | 50% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | LAM Alan | 100% | 89% | 34% | 3% | - | - | |
| 42 | AMOLSCH Dylan | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 43 | SAUNIER Cameron | 100% | 96% | 69% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 43 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 65% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 45 | AYMETT Robert (Skip) S. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 12% | 1% | |
| 46 | MAGALSKI Mary | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | BLACK Ethan | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 48 | MEGGERS Samuel | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 49 | HUTZ Michael B. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 50 | PETRUNKO Kyrylo | 100% | 57% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | SIEDOW William | 100% | 29% | 2% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.