Chelsea Piers Connecticut and Tim Morehouse Fencing Club - CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Ethan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% | |
| 2 | GONG Jerry | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
| 3 | BERA Enzo | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% | |
| 3 | BRANDT Jaden | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% | |
| 5 | CLARK Aram | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% | |
| 5 | NGUYEN Anthony | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% | |
| 7 | CHUNG Connor | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 8 | FLUECKIGER Michael | - | 4% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 4% | |
| 9 | WAXLER Ryan | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
| 10 | BADUSHOV Anton | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% | |
| 11 | NOVOSYOLOK Zachary | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 3% | |
| 12 | PINTO Marcus | - | - | 5% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 5% |
| 13 | TSAO Oliver | - | 4% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 3% | |
| 14 | WITCZAK Mateus | 1% | 9% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 2% | |
| 15 | ATWOOD Griffin | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
| 16 | LIN Maxim | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 20% | |
| 17 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 18 | DAI Zihou | - | - | 4% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 6% |
| 19 | LEE Andrew | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | |
| 20 | MONTALVO Matthew | 18% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | VAHABZADEH Jake R. | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 22 | OLOUGHLIN Quin | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 23 | MENDOZA Diwa | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 24 | YOOK Isaac | - | 5% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 3% | |
| 25 | SARWAHI Viraat | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% | |
| 26 | PANNOZZO Luca | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | MATTOO Deven | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | DEELY Hartigan | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 29 | LAUB William | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 2% | |
| 30 | WONG Caleb W. | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 31 | LIGH Checed | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | 3% | 31% | 45% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | ZHANG Emmanuel | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 34 | TSAO Alister | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | VILEMAITIS Tadas | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 37 | ZHAO Royce | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 38 | GAO Kai | 24% | 51% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 39 | KENNEDY Tomás | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 40 | SHAH Sohan | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | MILLET Etienne | 48% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | FRANCOIS Gabriel | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | SHEYNZON Benjamin | 26% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.