Chelsea Piers Connecticut and Tim Morehouse Fencing Club - CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | |
| 2 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 3 | BERA Enzo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | |
| 3 | BRANDT Jaden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% | |
| 5 | CLARK Aram | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% | |
| 5 | NGUYEN Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% | |
| 7 | CHUNG Connor | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 8 | FLUECKIGER Michael | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 29% | 4% | |
| 9 | WAXLER Ryan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 10 | BADUSHOV Anton | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% | |
| 11 | NOVOSYOLOK Zachary | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 3% | |
| 12 | PINTO Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 33% | 5% |
| 13 | TSAO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 28% | 3% | |
| 14 | WITCZAK Mateus | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 2% | |
| 15 | ATWOOD Griffin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
| 16 | LIN Maxim | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 20% | |
| 17 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
| 18 | DAI Zihou | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% | 6% |
| 19 | LEE Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 20 | MONTALVO Matthew | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | VAHABZADEH Jake R. | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 22 | OLOUGHLIN Quin | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 23 | MENDOZA Diwa | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 24 | YOOK Isaac | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 25% | 3% | |
| 25 | SARWAHI Viraat | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 26 | PANNOZZO Luca | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | MATTOO Deven | 100% | 78% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | DEELY Hartigan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 29 | LAUB William | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 2% | |
| 30 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 31 | LIGH Checed | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | 100% | 97% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | ZHANG Emmanuel | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 34 | TSAO Alister | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | VILEMAITIS Tadas | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
| 37 | ZHAO Royce | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
| 38 | GAO Kai | 100% | 76% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 39 | KENNEDY Tomás | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 40 | SHAH Sohan | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | MILLET Etienne | 100% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | FRANCOIS Gabriel | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | SHEYNZON Benjamin | 100% | 74% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.