Santa Clara, CA - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BESSIRE Nolan S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% | |
| 2 | LA ROSA Federico | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% |
| 3 | MAO Connor | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 3 | CHOI Ethan L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 5 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 30% | |
| 6 | KIM Aaron J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | 7% | |
| 7 | OTAKE Jared K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | 11% |
| 8 | LI Raphael C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 9 | BANERJEE Anup | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 10 | DARIANO Noah G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% |
| 11 | HSIUNG Richie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 8% | 1% |
| 12 | KUMBLA Samarth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 13 | WESTELIUS Isak R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 14 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 15 | XIAO Edward | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 16 | LAI Christopher W. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 20% | 1% | |
| 17 | JAYASEKARA Hiran H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | 15% |
| 18 | TSANG Matthew K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 13% | |
| 19 | WONG Nicholas A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% |
| 20 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 2% |
| 21 | LAO Scott E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | 4% | |
| 22 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 20% | 2% | |
| 23 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 24 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% |
| 25 | LI Ryan Z. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 31% | 5% | - | - |
| 26 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% | |
| 27 | CHIN Jason Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | |
| 28 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 29 | MILLER Duncan R. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 30 | HUANG Kevin D. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 31 | ZHANG Luke T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 19% | |
| 32 | PIESNER Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 86% | 41% | 7% | - | |
| 33 | XIAO Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
| 34 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 10% |
| 35 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% |
| 36 | HUANG Bernard | 100% | 98% | 79% | 34% | 7% | - | |
| 37 | UZGIRIS Kovas | 100% | 93% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | BAEK David | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 13% | 1% | |
| 39 | CHEN Bryce | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 40 | WOMACH Tristan | 100% | 98% | 74% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 41 | LIM Charles Q. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 42 | WONG Luke S. | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 44 | SWEENEY Quinn | 100% | 94% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 46 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 47 | LEE Jesse | 100% | 94% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | STIAGUN Nikita | 100% | 96% | 71% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 49 | MU Jeffrey | 100% | 92% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | NG Eben S. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 51 | WONG Louis | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 52 | CHIN Ryan | 100% | 82% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 53 | CHUANG Kian J. | 100% | 84% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | ELLIS Preston Y. | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | UPENDER Sky | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | BERSHIN Izzy | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | LIN Richard | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | RAINS Jackson T. | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | GRAPHIA Gabriel | 100% | 74% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.