Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BALL James T. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
2 | CULLIVAN Justice | - | - | - | - | 3% | 33% | 64% |
3 | NUNNINK Phillip W. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 72% |
3 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | - | 3% | 43% | 54% |
5 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 46% | 37% |
6 | LOVIN Vlad | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
7 | JU Alexander (Alex) Y. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
8 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
9 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | - | - | 4% | 28% | 50% | 17% | |
10 | JI Aidan Y. | 1% | 8% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 2% | |
11 | DUBOISKI Siarhei | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 53% | 30% |
12 | RYAN Connor Q. | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 52% | 17% |
13 | MORGAN Quinlyn (Quin) D. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% | |
14 | CHOE Jayden K. | - | 5% | 43% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
15 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
16 | MICKELSON Jacob P. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 20% | |
17 | PAI Dong-Ying | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 16% | |
18 | REEVES Liam | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 37% | 8% | |
19 | PITCHER Skylar L. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 20% |
20 | VAN BUREN Brett J. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 24% | 4% |
21 | LU Yikai | - | - | - | 4% | 24% | 47% | 24% |
22 | WILKINS Mateo | 2% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
23 | CHANG Albert T. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 20% | |
24 | SINHA Verdhaan | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 1% |
25 | MCISAAC Finn | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 5% | - |
26 | HIRSCH Bobbie A. | - | 3% | 24% | 47% | 24% | 1% | - |
27 | FLYNN Ian | - | 2% | 27% | 50% | 20% | 2% | |
28 | NOWAK Joseph A. | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 32% | 6% | |
29 | GOGOI Vir K. | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
30 | LIU Jacob B. | 2% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
31 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | - | - | < 1% | 8% | 38% | 54% | |
32 | OLSON Emerson | 28% | 45% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
33 | TSAO Lukas | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 2% |
34 | NYKAMP Caleb | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
35 | MAYER Vinzenz | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
36 | DECKER Evan M. | 8% | 33% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - | |
37 | WEINSTEIN Ethan | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
38 | BARCA Bryant | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
39 | WALKER Andrew J. | 1% | 9% | 31% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - |
40 | FU Steven | 8% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
40 | EUH Jason | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
42 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
43 | MARTIN William | 13% | 42% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
43 | BOYKO Miles | 3% | 22% | 44% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
45 | ZHAO Bowen | 27% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
46 | GNEUHS Sam | 1% | 9% | 40% | 39% | 11% | - | - |
47 | BREWNER Ethan | 54% | 39% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
48 | HAW Keith F. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% | - |
49 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | |
50 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
51 | ROBBINS Christopher (Chris) W. | 14% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
52 | ROBINSON Matthew | 27% | 63% | 10% | - | - | - | |
53 | VANOYEN Dominick | 25% | 45% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | |
54 | LOCKWOOD Jacob | 25% | 57% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
55 | GLOVER George | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
56 | MURPHY Padraig M. | 13% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
57 | MITTAL Sanil | - | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
58 | BOLARIN Oluwatosin N. | - | 1% | 13% | 39% | 37% | 9% | - |
59 | BLACKLEDGE Michael | 10% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
60 | STANTON Richard | 10% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
61 | HAGOPIAN Mitchell | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | |
62 | KOKKER Thomas | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
62 | SANDERS Jack | 65% | 34% | 2% | - | - | - | |
64 | HOWLAND Jonas | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
65 | VAGGALIS Denny | 45% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
66 | WEISS Quintin | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.