Santa Clara, CA - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | |
| 2 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
| 3 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 3 | WONG Matthew H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 5 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 12% |
| 6 | LEVY Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 8% |
| 7 | MA Bryant | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | < 1% |
| 8 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% |
| 9 | LING Eddie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 10 | SHEN Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 10% | |
| 11 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
| 12 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 13 | LOWE Austin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 14 | LI Jett | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 4% | |
| 15 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% | - |
| 16 | WU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 7% |
| 17 | LO Preston | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 18 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 19 | CHEN Justin K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 20 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 21 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 22 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
| 23 | ZENG Chuyi | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 24 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 25 | LYNCH Owen C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | |
| 26 | LAM Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 27 | MAK Osman K. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | SINGH Jahan | 100% | 97% | 72% | 28% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 30 | TAPUS Andrei | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | UHLIG Cole | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 32 | JUDSON Colin | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | CHU Colin | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | LIU William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 25% | 3% |
| 35 | FANG Jaden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 36 | SISINNI Riccardo | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 37 | KIM Benjamin | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | VENKATESH Valen | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 39 | SEO Shawn | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 39 | QUIGLEY Pierce | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 41 | LU Lucas | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
| 42 | PARK Jaden | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 43 | NG Micah | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 44 | MIN Lucas | 100% | 64% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 45 | ZHANG Luke | 100% | 76% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 46 | NGAI Julian | 100% | 98% | 84% | 56% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 47 | LOFTUS Luca | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 48 | SONG Beckett | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 49 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 87% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | WONG Esmond | 100% | 95% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 51 | SONG Matthew | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 52 | GOLWALA Yash | 100% | 66% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 53 | POTTS Diego | 100% | 90% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.