Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YIN Julia | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
| 2 | SPRINGER Sierra | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 3 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 39% | 44% |
| 3 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 5 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 6 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
| 7 | YAO Melinda | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 29% |
| 8 | SONG Angela | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 18% |
| 9 | AI Amy | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
| 10 | LEE REGINA | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
| 11 | BECKMAN Ana | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
| 12 | SMUK Alexandra S. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 18% |
| 13 | KUMAR Anusha | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | LEE Olivia | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 15 | MISHIMA Audrey | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | PRESMAN Aerin | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | SHIV Avni | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
| 18 | LEE Scarlett | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 19 | WATTANAKIT Anda | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 20 | SYKES Elynor | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 21 | CARRIER Meredith | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
| 22 | AZMEH nour | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 23 | KUMAR Eva | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 43% | 24% |
| 24 | QI Jarynne Valerie | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 16% |
| 25 | JAKEL Alysa C. | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 26 | SU Evelyn | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 16% |
| 27 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 28 | HUANG Lanlan | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 6% |
| 29 | NIX Reagan | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 30 | WALLER DEL VALLE Alanis | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | ZHAN Nancy | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 32 | WALTER Anna | 5% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 33 | RICHARDSON Meredith | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | CAFASSO Natalya | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 35 | MALLAVARPU saanvi | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
| 36 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 37 | WANG Victoria | 1% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 37 | MYRAH Vivienne | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 39 | WANG Jessie | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 40 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 41 | QIAN Irene | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 41 | SUN Hanya | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 43 | WANG Angelina | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 44 | LEE Yeriel | 11% | 41% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | PHUKAN Indra | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 46 | MENDOZA zoie | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 47 | HSIU Elizabeth | - | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 5% |
| 48 | SOBUS Yanka | 1% | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 49 | SUN Zeyu | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 50 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 51 | LEE Claire | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 52 | ZHU Serene M. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 52 | DOUGLAS Marketa F. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 54 | READ Lyla | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | LEE Camilla | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 56 | NGUYEN Ella | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 57 | BEAVER Ava | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 58 | LIN Ariel | 1% | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 59 | WANG Ziqi (yoyo) | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 60 | SHEN Yongen | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 61 | BO GENESIS | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 62 | DEPOMMIER Isabelle | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 63 | BALAKRISHNAN Trisha | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 64 | MEYER Rachel | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 65 | GUAN Isabella | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 66 | MARTYNOVA Diana | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 67 | BHATT Anisha | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 68 | DONG Ava | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 69 | IYER Ishana | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 70 | KOVALCHUK Erika S. | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 71 | TANG RUIRUI | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 72 | VICKERMAN Aspen | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 73 | XU Celina | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 74 | SMOTRITSKY Liat | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 75 | CHUNG Penelope | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 76 | BLANCO Ariia | 1% | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 77 | SCHMITT Harper | 6% | 35% | 38% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 78 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 79 | WONG Caitlin | 3% | 17% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 80 | ELTERMAN Kate | 31% | 48% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 81 | LIANG Jingjing | 5% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 82 | MOLLINIER Angel | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 83 | LY Hannah | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 84 | MONOVA Lilyana | 3% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 85 | LI Azalea | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% |
| 86 | MEYER Rebecca | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 87 | FENG Iris | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 88 | HOAGLAND Sally | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 89 | PAN Angela | 4% | 25% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 90 | CHENG Katherine | 3% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 91 | VARAN Kateryna | 11% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 92 | PANG Ashley | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 93 | DESAI Ela | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 93 | KANE Chloe | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 95 | DAVIS Elisabeth | 37% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 96 | SCHOR Elisabeth | 21% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 97 | STERN Savannah | 58% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 98 | JAMES Ashley | 30% | 47% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 98 | CHANG chaehee | 17% | 43% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 100 | CHADDA Farah | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 101 | YOUSSEF Caroline | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 102 | FREEMAN Kate | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 102 | ZOU You yang | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 102 | PYE Emily | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 105 | DAVIS Violet | 66% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.