Fike Recreation Center - Clemson, SC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CLICK Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% |
| 2 | MOORE Jeremy S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% |
| 3 | ZHOU Alec Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 33% | |
| 3 | BERNARD Jack B. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 5 | RICKMAN Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | 6% |
| 6 | RACHEL Dylan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 14% | |
| 7 | BIRT David (Dave) L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 86% | 45% | 9% | |
| 8 | GLENNON Sebastian J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 12% | |
| 9 | LEWIS Jared | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 10 | LE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 17% | 1% |
| 11 | LIM Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% | |
| 12 | ARNOLD Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
| 13 | HENDERSON Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 28% | 3% |
| 14 | SPITTLE Jake | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 10% | |
| 15 | CAMPBELL Joseph L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | - |
| 16 | SHELLABARGER Stephen | 100% | 99% | 82% | 41% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | JAAFAR Hamza | 100% | 99% | 84% | 44% | 10% | 1% | |
| 18 | PAYNE John T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 19 | KOKA Ashwin | 100% | 99% | 84% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
| 20 | GEISSLER Maximilian | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 10% | 1% | |
| 21 | COLLIER Baiden C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 22 | DECKER Carlton | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 23 | ECKARD Melody | 100% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 24 | MCGINNISS Andrew | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 25 | CUNNINGHAM Rowan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 26 | CATES Georgia | 100% | 68% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 27 | RAVITA Henry | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 28 | HERRICK Kerry K. | 100% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 29 | BANNON James | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 30 | HWANG Sungwon | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | DOTY Matthew | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | |
| 32 | SIGALAS Noah | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 33 | BARTLETT Caius | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 9% | - |
| 34 | PAL Ian K. | 100% | 93% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | PATEL Divyam | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 16% | 1% | |
| 36 | WILKENS Patricia A. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 37 | ALVARENGA Darby | 100% | 76% | 18% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | LEVERETT Corrina | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | PELLI Madeleine | 100% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.