Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HU Oliver W. | D V V D V V | V V V V V V | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 2 | KIM Nicholas W. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 3 | WU Wesley E. | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 3 | PELOSKY Ryan F. | D V V D V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 5 | KASI Sanjay | V V V D V | V V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 6 | KIM Tei D. | V V D V D V | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 7 | SHI Shenzhi | D V D V D V | V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 8 | OURSLER Jack | D D V D V | V V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 9 | CANDESCU Cristian | V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 10 | ANDREWS Nathan J. | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 11 | LOCKWOOD Owen | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 12 | VANNI Filippo A. | D V V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 13 | CHENG Thomas C. | V V D V D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 13 | BATRAK Alexander | V D V V D | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 15 | BLUTT Emerson B. | D D D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 16 | BALL James T. | V D V D D | V V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 17 | LUTAR Lucas N. | V V V V V V | D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 18 | XIAO Leon (Ruibo) | V V V V V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 19 | LEE Daniel C. | V V V V V D | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 20 | YU Vinni | V V D V V V | D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 21 | MCGOFF Jose I. | V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 22 | HO Ryan J. | V V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 23 | LIU Kevin B. | V D V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 24 | CARMAN Ian K. | V V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 25 | JANG Jaewon | D V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 26 | REGE Advaith | V V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 27 | SLEDESKI Andrew | V V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 28 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | V D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 29 | LIAO Alex J. | D V V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 30 | DING Allan | D D D V V V | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 31 | SIEGEL Elliot | D D D V V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 32 | ZHANG Henry C. | D V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 33 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | V V V D D D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 34 | BRODERICK Padraig | D D D V V V | D | 0.3 | 3 | +2.7 |
| 35 | GEE Brandon | D V D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 36 | PYO Michael M. | V D D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 37 | MILLER Trent D. | V D D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 38 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 39 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | D D V V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 40 | DING Jonathan | D V D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 41 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | D D V V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 42 | MARSHALL Ian | V D D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 43 | KWON Ethan | D V D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 44 | SACCOCCIO Nicholas P. | V V D D D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 45 | WU Jerry | D D V D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 46 | MANGE Nathan | D D V V D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 47 | CHAN Tyler | D D V D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 48 | FRITZ Ayden R. | V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 49 | MEYERS Lee P. | D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 50 | OZSOLAK Alex | D D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 51 | BAE Kevin | V D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 52 | SPOSATO Luke B. | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 53 | IVARSSON Oliver | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 54 | SANTULLI Tristan | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 55 | BELLUOMO David C. | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 56 | BAMSEY Connor G. | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 56 | ZHAO Jesse | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.