Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HU Oliver W. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 2 | KIM Nicholas W. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
| 3 | WU Wesley E. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 3 | PELOSKY Ryan F. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 5 | KASI Sanjay | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
| 6 | KIM Tei D. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 39% | 9% |
| 7 | SHI Shenzhi | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 8 | OURSLER Jack | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 14% | |
| 9 | CANDESCU Cristian | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 10 | ANDREWS Nathan J. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 21% | |
| 11 | LOCKWOOD Owen | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% |
| 12 | VANNI Filippo A. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 13 | CHENG Thomas C. | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
| 13 | BATRAK Alexander | 2% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 15 | BLUTT Emerson B. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 12% | |
| 16 | BALL James T. | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | LUTAR Lucas N. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
| 18 | XIAO Leon (Ruibo) | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 16% | |
| 19 | LEE Daniel C. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 20 | YU Vinni | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
| 21 | MCGOFF Jose I. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% | |
| 22 | HO Ryan J. | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 23 | LIU Kevin B. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 24 | CARMAN Ian K. | - | 8% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 25 | JANG Jaewon | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
| 26 | REGE Advaith | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 27 | SLEDESKI Andrew | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% | |
| 28 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
| 29 | LIAO Alex J. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 30 | DING Allan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
| 31 | SIEGEL Elliot | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | ZHANG Henry C. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
| 33 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | - | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | BRODERICK Padraig | 69% | 28% | 3% | < 1% | - | - | - |
| 35 | GEE Brandon | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 36 | PYO Michael M. | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | MILLER Trent D. | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 39 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% | |
| 40 | DING Jonathan | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 41 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 5% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 42 | MARSHALL Ian | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
| 43 | KWON Ethan | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 44 | SACCOCCIO Nicholas P. | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 45 | WU Jerry | 10% | 49% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | MANGE Nathan | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 47 | CHAN Tyler | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 48 | FRITZ Ayden R. | 21% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | MEYERS Lee P. | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 50 | OZSOLAK Alex | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 51 | BAE Kevin | 14% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | SPOSATO Luke B. | 46% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 53 | IVARSSON Oliver | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | SANTULLI Tristan | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 55 | BELLUOMO David C. | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | BAMSEY Connor G. | 34% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 56 | ZHAO Jesse | 49% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.