Davis Fencing Academy - Davis, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YAO Shun | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 29% | 9% |
| 2 | MEINHOLD Li | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 3 | COHEN Benjamin | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 5% |
| 3 | MILLER Kevin | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% |
| 5 | MENEGOLI Lorenzo | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 6 | HOFMAN Adam | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
| 7 | BARNETT Devin | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 8 | YAO Geoffrey | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 46% | 14% |
| 9 | MONDALA Adrian | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 10 | RYAN Seth | - | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 11 | NG Biwon | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 12 | LIU Benjamin | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 13 | LUH Ethan | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
| 13 | NGUYEN Steven | - | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 6% |
| 15 | RAJ Shrey | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 16 | CHANG Celine | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 17 | LIN Ashley | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 18 | WILLIAMS Derek | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 19 | BHATT Anisha | 9% | 45% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 20 | DUONG Zoey | 1% | 8% | 22% | 31% | 25% | 11% | 2% |
| 21 | KONG Martin | - | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
| 22 | RYAN Chris | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 23 | WILEY Erica | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 24 | YU Austin | - | 7% | 34% | 40% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 25 | STREEBY John | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 26 | RODRIGUES Vasco | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 27 | CHIEM Karen | 10% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 28 | RYAN Minhuey | - | 9% | 48% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | MADRID Betsy | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | BEATTY Max | 4% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | HICKS Zachary | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 32 | DUONG John | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 33 | LI Yunji | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 34 | RICHARDS Andrew | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 35 | BHARGAV Angad | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 36 | GONZALEZ Douglas | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 37 | LOONEY Christopher | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 38 | SALISTRA Emilia | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 39 | LUH Mia | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | CHENG Zijun | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 41 | JAIN Aashi | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | JAIN Prisha | 15% | 45% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.