Davis Fencing Academy - Davis, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YAO Shun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 38% | 9% |
| 2 | MEINHOLD Li | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 3 | COHEN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 5% |
| 3 | MILLER Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% |
| 5 | MENEGOLI Lorenzo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 6 | HOFMAN Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% |
| 7 | BARNETT Devin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 8 | YAO Geoffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 14% |
| 9 | MONDALA Adrian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 17% |
| 10 | RYAN Seth | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 11 | NG Biwon | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 12 | LIU Benjamin | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 13 | LUH Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 13 | NGUYEN Steven | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 6% |
| 15 | RAJ Shrey | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 16 | CHANG Celine | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 17 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 18 | WILLIAMS Derek | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
| 19 | BHATT Anisha | 100% | 91% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 20 | DUONG Zoey | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 38% | 13% | 2% |
| 21 | KONG Martin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 11% |
| 22 | RYAN Chris | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | WILEY Erica | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 24 | YU Austin | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 25 | STREEBY John | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 26 | RODRIGUES Vasco | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 27 | CHIEM Karen | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 28 | RYAN Minhuey | 100% | 100% | 91% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 29 | MADRID Betsy | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 30 | BEATTY Max | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | HICKS Zachary | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 32 | DUONG John | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 33 | LI Yunji | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% | 1% | - |
| 34 | RICHARDS Andrew | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 35 | BHARGAV Angad | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | GONZALEZ Douglas | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 37 | LOONEY Christopher | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 38 | SALISTRA Emilia | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 39 | LUH Mia | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | CHENG Zijun | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 41 | JAIN Aashi | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | JAIN Prisha | 100% | 85% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.