Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | SZAPARY Tristan B. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
2 | MERCHANT Reza H. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
3 | BASOK Daniel | D V V D V V | V V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
3 | SHENG Patrick Y. | D V D D V D | V V V V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
5 | MARAKOV Allen B. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
6 | POLKOVSKY Dylan S. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
7 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | V D D V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
8 | ZHANG YuJian | D V V D D | V V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
9 | DOUGLAS Colin F. | D V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
10 | WOLF Myles J. | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
11 | KIM Juni C. | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
12 | MUFEL Andrew | V D V V D V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
13 | ZARETSKY Daniel A. | V V V V D D | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
14 | KANG Michael H. | V D V V D | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
15 | RA Jr. Daniel M. | D D V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
16 | MCDERMOTT Brian | V V D D V D | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
17 | KOKENGE Clark | V V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
18 | PAOLINI Nathan R. | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
19 | ZHENG Hagen | V V D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
20 | INSLER Gabriel C. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
21 | SLAVINSKIY Alan | V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
22 | RODE Damian E. | D V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
23 | KRAVIT Connor B. | V V D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
24 | SPANO Gideon S. | V V D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
25 | MORSE Tyler | V D V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
26 | MARRAN Erik R. | V D V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
27 | BAKER Kevin G. | D V V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
28 | SHINE Peter C. | D V D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
29 | CHARRON Jack H. | D V D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
30 | GIBSON Nowell L. | D D V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
30 | MOGILEVICH Michael | V V V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
32 | CHILANA Savitoz (Savi) | V V D D D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
34 | INSLER Ethan C. | V V D D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
35 | SMITH Nicholas S. | D V D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
36 | DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. | V D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
37 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | D V V D D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
38 | RODELL Hunter C. | D D V V D V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
39 | KRENZ Michal A. | D D D V V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
40 | MAROOTIAN Alex S. | D V D V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
41 | CHOUDHARY Grisham | D D D V V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
42 | LUKANYUK Lorence | D D V V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
43 | SHAH Maximilian A. | V D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
45 | LI Brian | D D V D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
46 | SIDDIQUI Humza K. | V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
47 | SOOMRO Adam A. | D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
48 | FENWICK Luke A. | D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
49 | MARCHANT Albert J. | V D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
50 | SKIFFINGTON Sam | D D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
51 | LAI Coby | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
51 | LI Jeffrey | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
51 | SAMMS-HAY Cameron | D V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
54 | COX Gavin V. | D D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
57 | TONG Chihao | D D D D D V | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
58 | MISHIMA Torata | D V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
59 | WANG Eric S | V D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
60 | JENNINGS Adin | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
61 | ZHANG Franklin | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.