The Ohio State University Open

Senior Men's Foil

Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 1:45 PM

French Field House - Columbus, OH, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 KUCEBA Vitalijs - - - - 1% 13% 87%
2 CERVANTES Diego - - 1% 8% 38% 54%
3 VOGLER Justin K. - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
3 YANG Luao - - - 6% 34% 59%
5 ARIZA Isaac A. - - - 2% 15% 48% 35%
6 TOTUSEK Marek - - 1% 10% 39% 50%
7 SONG Leonardo T. - - - 8% 53% 39%
8 CHEN Yi-Tung - - 2% 14% 37% 35% 11%
9 NDIAYE Edriss G. - - - - 1% 15% 85%
10 KAISER Hans Z. - - - 2% 16% 49% 33%
11 MION Lorenzo - - - 5% 31% 64%
12 KORABLIN Anton - - - 3% 22% 46% 28%
12 LI Wangjie - 3% 13% 30% 33% 17% 3%
14 CULLIVAN Justice - - 1% 10% 32% 40% 17%
15 AYUPOV Ilya - - - 5% 46% 49%
16 SHEPHERD Conner M. - 3% 17% 39% 35% 7%
17 LOVIN Vlad - 1% 12% 36% 38% 13% 1%
18 PRASANNA Advaith 1% 8% 27% 38% 22% 4% -
19 PITCHER Skylar L. - 3% 17% 40% 34% 6%
20 DIVENTI Paul W. - 1% 9% 36% 43% 12%
20 FREEDMAN Samuel E. - 1% 7% 34% 46% 13%
22 WONG Antonio 1% 16% 38% 33% 11% 1% -
23 TANG Owen S. - 3% 18% 45% 29% 4%
24 FLANAGAN James - 1% 12% 38% 41% 8%
25 WANG Eric J. 1% 6% 25% 41% 24% 3%
26 MORGAN Quinlyn (Quin) D. - 2% 15% 44% 34% 6%
27 LU Yikai - - 4% 18% 39% 33% 6%
28 CHAN Matthew 1% 10% 34% 38% 15% 2% -
29 TSAO Lukas 10% 33% 37% 18% 3% -
30 BOUIE Jacob 3% 20% 44% 27% 6% -
31 UPTON Craig 4% 30% 46% 18% 2% -
32 HIRSCH Bobbie A. 15% 47% 32% 6% - -
33 BALL James T. - - - 2% 16% 48% 34%
34 JI Aidan Y. - 2% 15% 39% 36% 8% -
35 FORTUNE Alexander J. - - 1% 8% 37% 50% 5%
36 CAO Leon M. - - 1% 9% 36% 49% 5%
37 ORONOWICZ Jakub 10% 33% 38% 16% 3% -
38 STRINGER David 4% 23% 43% 27% 3% -
39 GATRELL Mitchell E. - 7% 29% 42% 19% 2%
40 BRIEN Jeremy - 4% 24% 44% 24% 3%
41 ZHAO Bowen 17% 47% 29% 7% 1% - -
42 MCISAAC Finn 1% 13% 37% 35% 12% 1% -
43 ALLEN Henry G. - 6% 30% 45% 17% 2% -
44 LIM Lance Jeremiah 44% 42% 13% 1% - -
45 FU Steven 25% 44% 26% 5% - -
46 LIU Ethan - 8% 31% 39% 19% 3% -
47 SANTOS Carlos R. 7% 29% 38% 21% 5% - -
48 ZHEREBTCOV Kirill 3% 22% 45% 25% 4% - -
49 GORDON Alexander 1% 8% 24% 36% 25% 7% -
50 KUSHNIR Aden N. 5% 26% 40% 24% 6% - -
51 XIAO Bowen 14% 41% 34% 10% 1% -
52 CLAYPOOL Conner 13% 44% 35% 8% 1% -
53 WICKA Clayton 23% 41% 26% 8% 1% -
54 DENMAN Matthew L. 16% 43% 32% 8% 1% -
55 SORRENTINO Salvatore 8% 32% 41% 18% 1% -
56 SON Eric 1% 10% 31% 38% 17% 3% -
57 BAKKE Alexander 47% 40% 12% 1% - - -
58 REAUME Nate 67% 30% 3% - - - -
59 WANG Jim 12% 36% 37% 14% 2% - -
60 GNEUHS Sam 15% 40% 35% 10% - -
61 FOLINO Anthony 19% 48% 27% 5% - -
62 FREDERICK David R. 22% 48% 25% 4% - -
63 CORNEJO Theodore B. < 1% 8% 31% 39% 19% 4% -
64 SMITH Brandon T. 33% 43% 20% 4% - - -
65 RAMACHANDRAN Omkar 27% 43% 24% 6% 1% - -
66 IRVINE Brody 50% 40% 9% 1% - - -
67 VALENTINO Paul 56% 37% 7% - - -
68 PINKERTON Joseph H. 10% 39% 37% 12% 1% -
69 ROGGERO Aiden 8% 36% 41% 14% 1% - -
70 FELKER Nolan 20% 45% 28% 6% - -
71 SHIVAK Josh 6% 32% 41% 18% 2% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.