French Field House - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KUCEBA Vitalijs | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% |
| 2 | CERVANTES Diego | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 54% | |
| 3 | VOGLER Justin K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | |
| 3 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | |
| 5 | ARIZA Isaac A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 35% |
| 6 | TOTUSEK Marek | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% | |
| 7 | SONG Leonardo T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 39% | |
| 8 | CHEN Yi-Tung | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% |
| 9 | NDIAYE Edriss G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% |
| 10 | KAISER Hans Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 33% |
| 11 | MION Lorenzo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | |
| 12 | KORABLIN Anton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 28% |
| 12 | LI Wangjie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 14 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% |
| 15 | AYUPOV Ilya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 49% | |
| 16 | SHEPHERD Conner M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 7% | |
| 17 | LOVIN Vlad | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 13% | 1% |
| 18 | PRASANNA Advaith | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 19 | PITCHER Skylar L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 6% | |
| 20 | DIVENTI Paul W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | 12% | |
| 20 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 13% | |
| 22 | WONG Antonio | 100% | 99% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 23 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | 4% | |
| 24 | FLANAGAN James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 8% | |
| 25 | WANG Eric J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 3% | |
| 26 | MORGAN Quinlyn (Quin) D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% | 6% | |
| 27 | LU Yikai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 6% |
| 28 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 29 | TSAO Lukas | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | BOUIE Jacob | 100% | 97% | 77% | 34% | 6% | - | |
| 31 | UPTON Craig | 100% | 96% | 66% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | HIRSCH Bobbie A. | 100% | 85% | 38% | 6% | - | - | |
| 33 | BALL James T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 34% |
| 34 | JI Aidan Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 8% | - |
| 35 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% | 5% |
| 36 | CAO Leon M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 5% |
| 37 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | 100% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | STRINGER David | 100% | 96% | 73% | 30% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 21% | 2% | |
| 40 | BRIEN Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | 3% | |
| 41 | ZHAO Bowen | 100% | 83% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | MCISAAC Finn | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 43 | ALLEN Henry G. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 44 | LIM Lance Jeremiah | 100% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 45 | FU Steven | 100% | 75% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
| 46 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 47 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 48 | ZHEREBTCOV Kirill | 100% | 97% | 74% | 29% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | GORDON Alexander | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 50 | KUSHNIR Aden N. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 51 | XIAO Bowen | 100% | 86% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | CLAYPOOL Conner | 100% | 87% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | WICKA Clayton | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | DENMAN Matthew L. | 100% | 84% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | SORRENTINO Salvatore | 100% | 92% | 60% | 19% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | SON Eric | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 57 | BAKKE Alexander | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 58 | REAUME Nate | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | WANG Jim | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | GNEUHS Sam | 100% | 85% | 45% | 10% | - | - | |
| 61 | FOLINO Anthony | 100% | 81% | 33% | 6% | - | - | |
| 62 | FREDERICK David R. | 100% | 78% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 63 | CORNEJO Theodore B. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 64 | SMITH Brandon T. | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 65 | RAMACHANDRAN Omkar | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | IRVINE Brody | 100% | 50% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 67 | VALENTINO Paul | 100% | 44% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 68 | PINKERTON Joseph H. | 100% | 90% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 69 | ROGGERO Aiden | 100% | 92% | 56% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | FELKER Nolan | 100% | 80% | 34% | 6% | - | - | |
| 71 | SHIVAK Josh | 100% | 94% | 62% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.