Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JAIN Aditya | - | - | - | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 2 | VAZQUEZ Zander | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% | |
| 3 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 81% |
| 3 | XIAO Edward | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% |
| 5 | WOO Christian | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% | |
| 6 | REYES Omar | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 42% | 14% | |
| 7 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | - | 3% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 6% | |
| 8 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | - | - | 7% | 38% | 55% | |
| 9 | SOTO Ulises G. | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 60% | |
| 10 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | - | - | 4% | 27% | 51% | 18% | |
| 11 | LE Jacob W. | - | 3% | 22% | 47% | 26% | 2% | |
| 12 | SIU Aiden | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% |
| 13 | DETERING Julian | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 39% | 12% |
| 14 | YU Anders | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% | |
| 15 | KO Brian J. | - | - | - | 1% | 19% | 79% | |
| 16 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 39% | |
| 17 | SONG Aiden S. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 79% |
| 18 | DINSAY Kristjan | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 19 | PIESNER Zachary C. | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 20 | NAYGAS Lawrence I. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 17% |
| 21 | MYERS Dean | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 5% | |
| 22 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 43% | 10% | |
| 23 | NGUYEN Liam | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | - |
| 24 | RENTERIA Emiliano | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 2% |
| 25 | NGUYEN Martin | - | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 26 | LLIDO Soren | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 27 | LUH Ethan K. | - | - | 6% | 27% | 45% | 22% | |
| 28 | CHIN Julian S. | - | - | 4% | 24% | 49% | 24% | |
| 29 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | 1% | 10% | 39% | 37% | 12% | 1% | |
| 30 | OH Jaden | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 31 | HOBSON Aaron K. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 39% | 37% | 10% |
| 32 | ZHENG Zhe | 1% | 13% | 37% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
| 33 | ZHANG Aaron | - | 7% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 3% | |
| 34 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 35 | BAEK David | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | KIM Aiden | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 37 | GOBBO Alexander | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 41% | 5% | |
| 38 | LI Matthew | - | 13% | 42% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 39 | SETLUR Bhrugu | 11% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | PARK Ryan | 2% | 48% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | PONS Diego | 2% | 20% | 48% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 42 | ARMSTRONG Elijah | 51% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 43 | TAN Peter | 3% | 28% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 44 | FINLEY Dylan | - | 6% | 31% | 43% | 18% | 2% | |
| 45 | LI Avery Peihong | - | 4% | 25% | 43% | 24% | 4% | |
| 46 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 3% | 25% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 47 | RYOU Aiden | - | 3% | 24% | 49% | 21% | 2% | |
| 48 | CHAN Connor | 48% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
| 50 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 51 | WU Lucas | 1% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 52 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 53 | WANG Ethan | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | - |
| 54 | NAVARRO Kato | 8% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 55 | MCCOWN Ronan | 4% | 29% | 46% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | PINCHENG Yao | 10% | 41% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | SMITH Grant D. | 2% | 20% | 47% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 58 | YOUNG Owen | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 59 | DALVA Michael | 53% | 39% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 60 | TULYAG Azim | 19% | 41% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 24% | 45% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | BORG Matthew | 18% | 48% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | PARK Sky | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 64 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 2% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 65 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 50% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 66 | LAM Nicolas | 22% | 51% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
| 67 | BLAM Matthew | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 68 | BOUCHARD Kai | 35% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 70 | LEE Daniel | 60% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 71 | GUY Ryan R. | 21% | 53% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 72 | ELVANDER Ethan | 24% | 52% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 73 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 73 | REICHEL Ezra | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | BAKER Ethan | 10% | 44% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 76 | HUANG Alston | 55% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 77 | FINNEY Lorenz | < 1% | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 78 | YUAN Jonathan | 92% | 8% | - | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.