Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEE Sumin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 34% |
2 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
3 | WU Amelia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
3 | PEHLIVANI Zara | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
5 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 10% |
6 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
7 | ZMURK Emma M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 23% |
8 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% |
9 | WANG Nora | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
10 | BALOGH Bella | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
11 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 98% | 76% | 29% | 3% | ||
12 | BUSH Emma | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 2% |
13 | HSIU Elizabeth | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 19% | 4% | - |
14 | SHELIN Chelsea | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
15 | BARON Sabina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 17% | 2% |
16 | CHANG Celine A. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
17 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
18 | YAO Yilin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 13% | 1% |
19 | VARGAS Susan M. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
20 | LORES Alicia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
21 | CHA Eugenie | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
22 | HEPLER Sarah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
23 | KIM Jayna | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
24 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 80% | 48% | 15% |
25 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 7% |
26 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
27 | DARANOUVONG Logan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
28 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | ||
29 | LENDIS Gabrielle | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
30 | LI Charlotte | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
31 | NEISINGH Isabelle | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
32 | KUKVA Taisiya | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
33 | HUANG Lanlan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
34 | MUN Brianna K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
35 | LEUNG Wan Kiu Hayley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
36 | PECK Maia A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
37 | CHANG Ella | 100% | 90% | 45% | 9% | - | ||
38 | BROOKS Tean R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 6% |
38 | SAYSON Samantha | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 22% | 4% |
40 | MARSH Janet L. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 51% | 8% | ||
41 | HARRISON Amelia H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% |
42 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
43 | GUESNARD Maelig | 100% | 69% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
44 | MONTOYA Amy C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
45 | SOIN Anika A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
46 | DALEY Keira | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
47 | KWON Tiara | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
48 | GULLY Wren | 100% | 83% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
49 | RUIZ Lusciana | 100% | 82% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
50 | PERKINS-OLLILA Emily | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | ||
51 | HABERMAN Hailey | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
52 | LEE Samantha X. | 100% | 76% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
53 | DUONG Zoey | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
54 | MITRANI Gabriela | 100% | 63% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
55 | HASIM Eurietta | 100% | 68% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
56 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
57 | CHIMIENTI Michele | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% |
58 | MADRID Maureen | 100% | 93% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
59 | EGENOLF Gabriella | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
60 | LIANG Jingjing | 100% | 52% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
61 | MEWES Katie M. | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.