Ataba Fencing Club - Hartland, WI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
2 | GLASS Timothy C | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | |
3 | KARNAS Karol | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 38% | ||
3 | LE BIHAN Henri | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% | |
5 | WHEELER Mark | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | ||
6 | TAKATA Ben | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 11% | |
7 | SOBESHKEVYCH Roman | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
8 | SERAFYM Damian | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
9 | BEACH John | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% | |
10 | BRADFORD Ethan | 100% | 99% | 84% | 39% | 6% | < 1% | |
11 | SPINA Joseph | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 6% |
12 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoria | 100% | 91% | 60% | 20% | 2% | - | |
13 | BISSEN Quinn | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | 16% | ||
14 | NAGANOBORI Hiroki | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% |
15 | ROBBINS Christopher | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 4% | |
16 | HONEK Kyle | 100% | 97% | 70% | 16% | 1% | - | |
17 | TYLER Syd (Sydney) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 15% |
18 | WATTANAKIT Anda | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 12% | 1% | |
19 | ELTERMAN Lev | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
20 | VENKATACHALAM Panav | 100% | 97% | 76% | 33% | 4% | ||
21 | SWANSON Dave | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 47% | |
22 | SWENSON Nikita | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
23 | RITTERBUSCH Timothy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 2% |
24 | CURTY Jack | 100% | 100% | 86% | 48% | 13% | 1% | |
25 | MILLER Lance W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 8% | |
26 | WEINSTEIN Ethan | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% | |
27 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
28 | SWENSON Alexandra | 100% | 82% | 39% | 8% | - | ||
29 | SAHA Sayan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - |
30 | SORG Jacqueline | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | ||
31 | BANSAL Shaurya | 100% | 97% | 71% | 19% | 1% | ||
32 | MCDOWELL Will | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
33 | OLIVEIRA Giovanna | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 2% | ||
34 | KOSS Everett | 100% | 85% | 25% | 3% | - | ||
35 | KOSS Harrison | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
36 | TIERNEY Luke | 100% | 98% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
37 | SHOEMAKER Oliver | 100% | 83% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
38 | ONO Melisa | 100% | 65% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
39 | PETERSON Clio | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
40 | REESE Becky | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
41 | SCHLIEP Anna | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 2% | ||
42 | HART Jenna | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.