Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
2 | CO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% |
3 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | |
3 | SISINNI Riccardo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
5 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% |
6 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
7 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
8 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
9 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
10 | WU Alistair | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
11 | DINSAY Kristjan A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
12 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 9% |
13 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
14 | LIPPMAN Sam | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
15 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% | |
16 | NG Kenneth | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
17 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
18 | NGUYEN Liam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 12% | 1% |
19 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 36% |
20 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 17% | 2% |
21 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 4% |
22 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 4% |
23 | SEAL Maximus R. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
24 | LING Eddie | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% | |
25 | KIM Daniel Y. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
26 | YEE Johnathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
27 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
28 | SETLUR Bhrugu | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
29 | LO Preston | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
30 | WU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
31 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
32 | LAM Nicolas | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
33 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 29% |
33 | NGUYEN Martin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
35 | ANDERSON Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
36 | BAEK David | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
37 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 38% | 7% |
38 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
39 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
40 | PARK Rion | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
41 | REICHEL Ezra | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
42 | PARK Sky | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
43 | GONZALEZ Matthew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
44 | CRACRAFT John R. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
45 | SHEN Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
46 | HARRIS Otto | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
47 | PARK Ryan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
48 | TKACHUK Daniel | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
49 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 92% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
50 | PONS Diego | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
51 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | |
52 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
53 | NGAI Julian | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
54 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
55 | TULYAG Azim | 100% | 91% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
56 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
57 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
58 | BAE Eugene | 100% | 88% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - |
59 | LI Jett | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
60 | YU Leo | 100% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
61 | PINCHENG Yao | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
62 | WONG Evan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
63 | BOUCHARD Kai | 100% | 99% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
64 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
65 | SAH Steven | 100% | 98% | 75% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
66 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 100% | 56% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
67 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 100% | 73% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
68 | ORNELAS Matteo | 100% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
69 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
70 | LIU William | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
70 | PETERSON Lucas | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
72 | BECKER Ethan | 100% | 6% | - | - | - | - | - |
73 | ZHANG Graham | 100% | 84% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
74 | LIANG Ethan | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.