Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 28% | |
| 2 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | - | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 47% | 12% |
| 3 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 80% |
| 3 | YAO Yilin | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 5 | LEE Natasha | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 51% |
| 6 | KIM Zoe L. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 45% | 24% |
| 7 | LAN Alice S. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 21% | |
| 8 | SHARMA Sanvi | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 9 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% |
| 10 | CHUNG Kimberly L. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 11 | LEE Rachel | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 12 | LIN Ashley | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 13 | PANT Anisha | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 41% |
| 15 | MONTOYA Amy C. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 29% | 2% |
| 16 | HUANG Lanlan | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 41% | 14% | 1% |
| 17 | CHIEM Karen | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 4% | |
| 18 | HABERMAN Hailey | 4% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 19 | KIM Jayna | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | DUONG Zoey | 3% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 21 | ZHANG Yixuan | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 22 | HSIU Elizabeth | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | LEE Samantha X. | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | MCCLAIN-YU Eri M. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% | |
| 25 | ENRILE Erica | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 26 | TAN Jocelyn | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 27 | EDWARDS Darby | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | WILEY Erica | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 32% |
| 29 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 30 | CHA Eugenie | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 3% | |
| 31 | GUAN Isabella | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 32 | BO GENESIS | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | WANG Angelina | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | PACHECO Naomi | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 35 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 36 | LEUNG Wan Kiu Hayley | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 37 | LIANG Jingjing | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | SALISTRA Emilia | 7% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | RICH Caroline B. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 39 | LI Charlotte | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 41 | MARTYNOVA Diana | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 42 | LYNCH Kristin A. | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 42 | HOFMAN Haejung | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 44 | WANG Zoe | 12% | 40% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | JAMES Ashley | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 46 | SRIVASTAVA Arya | 26% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | RYAN Minhuey | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 48 | SCHMID Carola K. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% | |
| 48 | MEWES Katie M. | 32% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | NAIR Supriya | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 51 | DING Grace | 15% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 8% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | LAI Amanda | 10% | 38% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | RADICH Lori G. | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | ONO Melisa | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 57 | MULAGARI Swarasai | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | RUNYON Cynthia J. | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 59 | STANICA Teodora O. | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 60 | BLANCO Ariia | 16% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.