Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% | |
2 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 12% |
3 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% |
3 | YAO Yilin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
5 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 51% |
6 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 24% |
7 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 21% | |
8 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
9 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% |
10 | CHUNG Kimberly L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
11 | LEE Rachel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
12 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
13 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
14 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% |
15 | MONTOYA Amy C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 2% |
16 | HUANG Lanlan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 15% | 1% |
17 | CHIEM Karen | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 4% | |
18 | HABERMAN Hailey | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
19 | KIM Jayna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
20 | DUONG Zoey | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
21 | ZHANG Yixuan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
22 | HSIU Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% | 1% |
23 | LEE Samantha X. | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
24 | MCCLAIN-YU Eri M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | |
25 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
26 | TAN Jocelyn | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
27 | EDWARDS Darby | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | 10% | 1% |
28 | WILEY Erica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 32% |
29 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
30 | CHA Eugenie | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% | |
31 | GUAN Isabella | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | - | |
32 | BO GENESIS | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
33 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
34 | PACHECO Naomi | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
35 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
36 | LEUNG Wan Kiu Hayley | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
37 | LIANG Jingjing | 100% | 76% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
38 | SALISTRA Emilia | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
39 | RICH Caroline B. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
39 | LI Charlotte | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | - | |
41 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
42 | LYNCH Kristin A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | 1% |
42 | HOFMAN Haejung | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
44 | WANG Zoe | 100% | 88% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
45 | JAMES Ashley | 100% | 60% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
46 | SRIVASTAVA Arya | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
47 | RYAN Minhuey | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
48 | SCHMID Carola K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% | |
48 | MEWES Katie M. | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
50 | NAIR Supriya | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
51 | DING Grace | 100% | 85% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
52 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
53 | LAI Amanda | 100% | 90% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
54 | RADICH Lori G. | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
54 | ONO Melisa | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
56 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
57 | MULAGARI Swarasai | 100% | 83% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
58 | RUNYON Cynthia J. | 100% | 85% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
59 | STANICA Teodora O. | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
60 | BLANCO Ariia | 100% | 84% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.